We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We like that this solution allows us to fully define our test environments, and link them using different code. This means we can do different tests, but with one basic structure, and then export the data and use it in other platforms."
"Microsoft PowerApps allows you to simplify business processes and user experience. You can also create responsive applications and canvas apps through this solution. It's an easy to scale, stable, and low-code solution."
"It is easy to design automation processes."
"It's very easy to build an app using this solution."
"It is stable and reliable."
"The initial setup is not complicated."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Model-driven or Canvas application-making platforms. The power of the two gives us exactly what we are looking for."
"The most valuable feature is that PowerApps can be used by most business users. It is not only for programmers."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"The solution needs a bit more refinement in general."
"There are occasional performance challenges."
"The stability of this solution could be better."
"One of the major problems with it is what PowerApps calls the delegation warning. Regardless of what platform, data source, et cetera, that you're using, you can't retrieve more than 2000 records."
"The user interface is pretty good, although it is a little bit clunky and can be improved."
"PowerApps can't do a lot of things that users need now. For example, it can't handle signatures."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities in the future."
"The connectors are the main components that reference the data sources, and these need to be improved."
"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Pillir is ranked 43rd in Rapid Application Development Software. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Pillir is most compared with . See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. Pillir report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.