We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I use the solution for messaging and chatting."
"Valuable screen sharing feature."
"We didn't face any problems with the product's scalability. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Managing meeting on Microsoft Teams is better than managing traditional face to face meetings."
"I like the solution's chat and meeting feature. We have different teams and the product helps us to communicate fastly. Within five minutes all the teams can be on the same page."
"I find the ability to maintain group and conference information for project-related work useful."
"It allows us to invite members to attend the meeting efficiently."
"Sharing screens is valuable."
"It improved transparency around work products."
"For any organization with more than one person in it, if they are trying to organize things to let people in the company know what others are doing, then this solution is good for them."
"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."
"It's stable. It's very widely used by companies. Also, the knowledge of the product has improved over the years, and by other companies that support it or are Microsoft SharePoint partners. So if there are problems, there's always a user or company that knows the information or can help you; even with very uncommon problems."
"SharePoint is easy to collaborate with."
"The metadata services, the WCF service integration and the Voxel feature are three most valuable elements of this solution."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"It has made us faster and more efficient."
"What I'd like to improve in Microsoft Teams are the calendar management and task management tools, because they're not easy to use. They're not user-friendly."
"The solution needs to be more stable. I have found Zoom to be more stable than Teams."
"It may be a little daunting to learn and is still a tool in development."
"The remote control needs some improvement."
"The product is not fully integrated in Brazil."
"The product should improve its security aspect, scalability, stability, and screen recording. It would be nice if Teams could come up with a feature where I can write chats and send them as mail. It would be also good if Teams could be connected to our application software so that for any doubts that can occur during the training, the operator can resolve them through chats. Hence, they can easily guide and close the issue."
"The application's user interface on Google has shortcomings that need to be improved."
"The user interface is non-intuitive and should be improved."
"Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
"We do sell Hyland OnBase, which is probably a competitor to SharePoint and does a lot more. In our own organization, we haven't had a need for it, but certainly, for our customers, we are finding that to be a better fit. In terms of the technical reasons for that, I'm not involved much on that side, so I can't give specifics, but there is certainly room for them to improve or add on certain features that clearly are not available in SharePoint, but they are available in Hyland OnBase."
"It should have a Google-caliber search ability and a model-based GUI."
"It does not integrate despite being part of the Microsoft family."
"Replication needs improvement."
"I would like a simpler, more cost-effective solution for connecting data sources with workflows and BI tools, or data mining tools."
"No good process to import emails from several users into a single comprehensive SP repository."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 149 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, Symphony, Loom, Chatter and Huddle, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Objective ECM. See our Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint report.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
