We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"It can scale."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."
"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"The stability could be better."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."
"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 42 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 13th in Cloud Data Integration with 5 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "Handles a wide variety of data sources and efficiently organizes and manages integration processes". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Zapier and Jitterbit Harmony . See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.