We performed a comparison between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"The Oracle integration tool is the most comfortable tool for using those Oracle products."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the SFTP adapters, file adapters, and risk adapters, that we use in everyday projects."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"I found flexibility most valuable in the SAP Cloud Platform. It's a simple tool that's good even for first-time users."
"The most valuable features of SAP Cloud Platform are security integration and scalability."
"The most valuable feature is the data synchronization, or the push and pull of the data."
"SAP is an excellent company with an excellent reputation, excellent products, and dedicated customer support."
"The ability to build custom applications on the BTP platform, reducing customization on the SAP HANA system and improving performance and management."
"The product is very stable."
"The solution is scalable."
"It’s easy to maintain, as everything is handled by SAP."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
"The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"Dealing with the large file size has occasionally been a challenge."
"The bulk processing needs improvement."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"From what I understand, the SAP Cloud Platform is for implementation on AWS or Azure, and it's not meant to be a full-fledged cloud solution, so while using the platform, an area for improvement is that it has fewer offerings and is less flexible when compared to AWS. AWS has a lot more flexibility than the SAP Cloud Platform. I've also used Azure in college and AWS in between, and I prefer AWS over the SAP Cloud Platform. The only reason I would ever stick with the SAP Cloud Platform is to create applications integrated with SAP or with other companies within SAP, such as SuccessFactors. When you go into the SAP Cloud Platform web page, it's a bit bland and has relatively limited offerings. For example, there doesn't seem to be in-house MongoDB support, but I realize there's in-house support for the PostgreSQL database, so there are fewer offerings in the SAP Cloud Platform. Yes, you can always go for a database on the actual MongoDB server rather than depending on the offerings of the SAP Cloud Platform. However, it's still better to support MongoDB from the platform, so payment is consolidated, rather than going to a different location to make a payment. Another room for improvement in the SAP Cloud Platform is the need to create an SAP subaccount if you need to use the platform unless you have an SSO login by Google or if you're using a different identity provider such as Microsoft or Google. Instead of requiring dependency on SAP, it would be good if users could use the SAP Cloud Platform even without a subaccount on SAP. For example, when hosting an application on AWS or Azure, you don't have to create an account in Amazon or Microsoft. You can still do it using Google. You can use almost anything, so I'd like SAP to improve by removing the dependency, particularly the requirement to create an SAP account to use the SAP Cloud Platform."
"I feel that SAP provides the tools, but after that, you are left on your own. It would be better if they provided more support throughout the usage of their solutions."
"The product needs improvement for serverless native integrations. They should opt for serverless features as all the customers worldwide choose cloud-based products."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvements with the price and the licensing."
"Usability is a challenge most of the time and not being able to get all of the information."
"When they innovate too fast, they end up confusing their customers."
"Planning features are limited to the finance module."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite. See our Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs. SAP Cloud Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.