We compared Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: When comparing Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, it is generally believed that Deep Security has a simpler and more straightforward initial setup. Deep Security also offers a wider variety of deployment options and provides helpful documentation and video tutorials. Conversely, Carbon Black Endpoint's setup can be more difficult, requiring complex configurations and customized policies. However, Carbon Black Endpoint has advantageous features like MDR capability and a whitelisting process for protection against zero-day threats. Deep Security has a smaller impact on system resources and efficient threat detection, whereas Carbon Black Endpoint offers superior log analysis and continuous monitoring. Some customers find Deep Security's pricing to be high, while Carbon Black Endpoint is generally described as expensive. The quality of customer service for both products has received mixed reviews and has room for improvement.
"It provides security and protection. The endpoint firewall is valuable."
"Patch management is most valuable. The major selling point of Deep Security is that it is based on the cloud. Deep Security is for the servers and databases of data centers, and generally, for patch management, you have to shut down the machines, and then you have to restart them. So, they need shutdown time, which is a cost. Big enterprises don't want to shut down their database or their data center for any kind of patch. Deep Security creates a wall and downloads all patches. You install it on the cloud. So, it saves your server from any kind of intrusion or any kind of penetration, and whenever you get a chance or time, in six, eight, or nine months, you can physically download or install all those patches in one go. So, it saves you time. It also saves your shutdown time and keeps your data center safe."
"In addition to providing our clients a view of what's happening in their data centers, it also does virtual patching in the data center. It enhances the security in the data center big time."
"The initial setup was straightforward and we didn't have any problem with it."
"Deep Security is a good product for managing a few servers."
"The integration and configuration of this product in our AWS environment was good. We haven't had any problems at all."
"It has a perfect SaaS which integrates with AWS, offering flexibility to deploy quickly and easily in the cloud."
"It serves its purpose and works well."
"The data analysis is the most valuable because of the whitelist database. It is different than standard IDS solutions."
"The solution is very useful and easy to handle. You don't need much intervention with this product."
"It uses machine learning and behavioral analytics for advanced threat detection and response."
"I rate Carbon Black CB Defense an eight out of ten for the ease of its initial setup."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint was easy."
"We can access computers remotely if we need to."
"The new feature that we're deploying, the new offering from Carbon Black, is MDR, which stands for manage, detect, and response. It's the most valuable feature because Carbon Black will be continuously checking the logs, and they will be advising us on how to improve some of the policies as well as review the logs. If there are any nefarious agents or things happening on the end points, they will know."
"The EDR and reports were helpful in improving our organization."
"The risk is very complex. We need our tools to be more intelligent, more automated, more detectable."
"The workloads must be better."
"The solution could use more integration."
"The working interface and the reports for non-technical people could use improvement. They are a bit scary."
"We'd like to see extended capacity in the on-premises versions."
"The email relays and proxies could be improved."
"We want to see improved authentication."
"Some of the reporting and integrations could be more robust."
"But here, we hardly can take any kind of a report out of Carbon Black, so I think that should be something that should be more user-friendly."
"Needs improvement in the area of infrastructure for on-premise installation."
"Right now, Carbon Black CB Defense doesn't support cloud computing and Kubernetes."
"As far as I know, Carbon Defense has nothing that can be installed on mobile devices. It lacks a defense solution for mobile devices, especially mobile tablets. I would like to see support for mobile devices and the pricing should be less than the pricing for a normal workstation."
"Carbon Black needs to do a better job of proving their platform in the industry, and providing a bit more access to do industry testing with real world examples to help prove their platform."
"The directions for Splunk are spot on, but it is difficult to find anything on integration with AlienVault,"
"The pricing could be more reasonable."
"I would personally give the tech support a rating of seven out of ten."
Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 16th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 62 reviews. Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Symantec Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.