We performed a comparison between Trend Vision One - Cloud Security and Virsec Security Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)."The remediation process is good."
"Support has been very helpful and provides regular feedback and help whenever needed. They've been very useful."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to gain deep visibility into the workloads inside containers."
"The management console is the most valuable feature."
"We like PingSafe's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases."
"The most valuable aspect of Singularity Cloud Security is its unified dashboard."
"Cloud Native Security offers attack path analysis."
"The management console is highly intuitive to comprehend and operate."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"Trend Vision One goes beyond standard endpoint security by offering a dedicated IPS mechanism with a unique, separate database for servers, along with a large feature set specifically designed for server environments."
"The security is good."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"We use the solution for Zero-day protection."
"In addition to the console alerts, I would like PingSafe to also send email notifications."
"One of the issues with the product stems from the fact that it clubs different resources under one ticket."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."
"It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better."
"The alerting system of the product is an area that I look at and sometimes get confused about. I feel the alerting feature needs improvement."
"We recently adopted a new ticket management solution, so we've asked them to include a connector to integrate that tool with Cloud Native Security directly. We'd also like to see Cloud Native Security add a scan for personally identifying information. We're looking at other tools for this capability, but having that functionality built into Cloud Native Security would be nice. Monitoring PII data is critical to us as an organization."
"The categorization of the results from the vulnerability assessment could be improved."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The tool's dashboard needs to load since it is not responsive and takes time to load."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 18 reviews while Virsec Security Platform is ranked 26th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 1 review. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6, while Virsec Security Platform is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Virsec Security Platform writes "Helps with Zero-day protection ". Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub, whereas Virsec Security Platform is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and CrowdStrike Falcon.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors and best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
