We performed a comparison between Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools."We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."
"It is a scalable solution."
"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."
"The program is very stable and scalable."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition."
"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."
"The integration with Jira and the ability for extra configurations are the most valuable features."
"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the dashboard."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."
"Integration with Confluence and JIRA."
"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."
"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."
"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes."
"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."
"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."
"TestRail's user interface is not great. When you use it for the first time, you will be very uncomfortable and not know how to create test cases. It doesn't have a field for preconditions and post-conditions."
"With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins."
"Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow."
"I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were."
"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."
"This solution has room for improvement. For example, some particular projects need to adjust access or add additional members and this isn't always possible. Role-based access would improve this."
"TestRail by Gurock could improve by adding a defect management module tool. It would add a lot of value if I want to install it and I don't have Jira or an isolating team. For example, if I am providing a service it's separated from the development team, it then would be better to have defect management included with the test management. However, as it is now I need to be integrated with Jira or another defect management tool to complete the testing process."
More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Pricing and Cost Advice →
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is ranked 13th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while TestRail is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is rated 7.2, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira writes "Integrates with any automation tool, but the granular reporting feature should be more intuitive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis Tosca, Tricentis qTest and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis qTest, TFS, Tricentis Tosca and Sealights.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
