We performed a comparison between TestRail and Zephyr Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."
"From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."
"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."
"I use the solution for test management."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."
"Reliable and stable. It is important that TestRail be up and running 24/7 as we have users around the world using it."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the dashboard."
"Integration with Confluence and JIRA."
"The solution does its job well."
"It has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money."
"If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise."
"It has integration with test automation tools."
"We use the solution for test case management."
"It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management."
"Zephyr Enterprise is a stable solution."
"TestRail should improve its pricing."
"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."
"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."
"Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports."
"The reports should be more user-friendly."
"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."
"The platform needs improvement regarding performance and creating links."
"It would be nice to have a description section when creating the test scenario itself so I can indicate what the configuration should be."
"We would like support for the agile and behavior-driven development (BDD) approaches."
"Zephyr Enterprise needs to redesign the reporting."
"We faced some errors while uploading the test cases."
"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."
"Security needs improvement to protect customer information better."
"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."
"Creating better default varieties of reporting would make the product much better and more popular."
"We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide such a utility."
TestRail is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews while Zephyr Enterprise is ranked 4th in Test Management Tools with 8 reviews. TestRail is rated 8.0, while Zephyr Enterprise is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zephyr Enterprise writes "Highly stable solution and meets users' needs". TestRail is most compared with Tricentis qTest, TFS, Tricentis Tosca, Sealights and PractiTest, whereas Zephyr Enterprise is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center, Tricentis Tosca, Tricentis qTest, TFS and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira. See our TestRail vs. Zephyr Enterprise report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.