We performed a comparison between Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management and Broadcom Clarity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The dashboard is the most valuable feature."
"There were probably about five or six metrics that we used. As a result, the groups that I supported were consistently ranked at the absolute top of the organization, as we were leveraging these built-in tools for tracking."
"The new UI makes it easier for people to go in there and know what to do. To train people, it's faster, more intuitive."
"It is very stable. We are on demand. With on demand, those guys keep it running."
"it creates visibility across our whole organization. People that were often left in the dark wondering what was happening with projects. Now have an easy solution to see all the information they want to see across the whole portfolio."
"We are able to track budgets, and with timesheets, actuals against budgets."
"It helps all the portfolio managers and the program managers to take stock of the financial situation at the program and portfolio level, because it rolls up all the financials at the product level."
"The app style of the new UI is absolutely fantastic. It's the right way to go. Our users will love it."
"You can identify resources by roles."
"The user-experience, enhanced performance, and in-hand governance can be improved."
"they could improve the mobile app. I think right now it only offers time sheet. If they can integrate a lot of other components into it I think that would be helpful for the users."
"They need something so that if we, say, send some sheets to users, or for the scenario where not everybody has access to Clarity, but are part of planning; those people should be able to upload data directly to Clarity."
"The Work Breakdown Structure in the Tasks: I should be able to drag and drop to a level three instead of just stuck at level two."
"In the community, I do not see a lot of answers. A lot of people asking lots of questions, but I am not seeing a lot of answers come through."
"In the timesheet UX, you can't do things like splitting time, managing overtime versus regular time, very easily. That would be helpful."
"The Latin American support could be better due to the language barrier."
"The forms (e.g., project properties page) need to be more attractive, colorful, and field more flexibility for validations."
"I want to see integration for SMS functionality."
More Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is ranked 14th in Project Portfolio Management with 4 reviews while Broadcom Clarity is ranked 2nd in Project Portfolio Management with 136 reviews. Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is rated 7.6, while Broadcom Clarity is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management writes "Helps us to implement and understand the status of our projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Broadcom Clarity writes "A dynamic solution with a lot of great out-of-the-box calculations, but integration with reporting utilities is a bit painful". Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is most compared with ARIS BPA, LeanIX, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and Alfabet FastLane, whereas Broadcom Clarity is most compared with Microsoft Project, Jira, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planview Portfolios and Smartsheet. See our Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs. Broadcom Clarity report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
