We performed a comparison between Apigee and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The usability is one of the best aspects of the product."
"Apigee's best features are flexibility and breadth of capabilities."
"I use it because it's simple, it automatically updates, and It hasn't given me any issues."
"It is easy to set up. It is on Google Platform, and there are multiple deployment models they support, which is great."
"Items around the mobilization of the API interface and the ability to automate validations for our APIs are the most valuable aspects."
"The stability of the solution is good. There aren't issues surrounding bugs or glitches. We don't find that it crashes or freezes. It's pretty reliable."
"Apigee makes proxy management very simple."
"It accelerates development and deployment processes."
"Having the SEEBURGER consulting team perform the installation alleviates a lot of headaches and ensures a stable system."
"When orders come in they go into our ERP system directly, so there is integration there."
"With SEEBURGER BIS, you can string as many different activities together in your workflows as you want. You can put them in any order, like a piece of code. One leads into the next, which leads into the next. It is just very flexible from that vantage point. This makes it so easy to use and reduces the number of moving parts that you need to have. It is just a lot less frustrating not having to conform to how some other vendor software works."
"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) also allowed us to connect EDI vendors at will."
"It's the reliability. And the message tracking is quite good, where we can go in and see if we have an issue."
"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a highly stable solution that offers rich features for our B2B integration."
"It is stable and reliable. We have not had any issues."
"We rarely get hanged processes."
"The initial setup is not straightforward, particularly for hybrid solutions."
"Apigee could do more to make users aware of what is available in the add-ons."
"They have an external developer platform that was a little bit painful."
"Apigee lacks market presence."
"One feature they have to invest time into is the developer portal they use."
"Apigee on premise is quite complex and it is always moving faster."
"Development IDE, especially for Architect Review."
"The analytical aspect of it could be better. I think it is fair if Apigee lets you configure some of the metrics of the key details you want to monitor in terms of analytics."
"On the server side, there are a lot of administration and configuration files that you need to go in and do maintenance on. You have to find them in a certain folder so it's very error-prone and it can be a little time consuming unless it's documented. They could pull some of those individual configuration files into the product itself where there's a better user interface for that."
"The ability to bind a mapping to an agreement seems a bit clunky. It would be nice to have a better way of navigating to a map name rather than using a drop down list."
"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite does not have an end user or subscriber console which can show the traffic status."
"I would like there to be a feature that could handle the limited server."
"Some of the functionality for retriggering documents, where you have to step through a termination process and then retrigger it, versus just being able to restart or retrigger more easily, is a bit challenging, depending on the scenario."
"The initial set up was done by SEEBURGER consulting. It can be complex due to various factors, such as server settings, database settings, and security settings."
"A true debugger that allows you to step through the process would be a good improvement. Right now, we are limited to reading the log file generated by the test screen in Mapping Designer."
"We are a little locked in with understanding the errors that we receive. We are working with their support to prevent these issues when they come into the database. We use a SQL database and believe they can do better when it comes working with large databases. We have had few instances where the system is hanging, which are most likely from the database. We are working with their support to find out the problem and fix their system. We have tried to use their notification system to prevent these issues, but they need to improve their monitoring system."
More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is ranked 19th in API Management with 37 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite writes "Gives us the flexibility to hook up to systems using any protocol out there". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, Amazon API Gateway, WSO2 API Manager and Layer7 API Management, whereas SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is most compared with SAP Cloud Platform, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, Mule ESB, IBM B2B Integrator and Microsoft Azure API Management. See our Apigee vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
