We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, New Relic, AppDynamics and others in Mobile APM."The most valuable feature of the solution is its GUI."
"We have found the scalability to be quite good."
"In the case of a mobile banking application, AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring successfully reduced the response time from eight seconds to just one second. In another example, the tool identified an issue within the mobile app, causing lost transactions in the billing system."
"Whenever the application crashes from user behavior, we can easily simulate the error. We are happy with this feature and find it to be valuable."
"For anybody who is looking into enhancing or improving their application code quality, I would definitely recommend this solution."
"There are many features that are very valuable to us, but the ability to monitor the status of the users' experience in real-time is one of them."
"The way these tools show the information is very useful. this is a tool that records information from Java and .NET applications, and obtain information about how many times an method has been call in a period of time (usually 30 sec), how many times respond in this span of time or is delayed or stall."
"The configuration and the manager tool are good features."
"Command center is a new feature that provides agent maintenance and support without involving the application team. It saves lots of time for APM team."
"Our development cycle has definitely improved as far as the turnaround time on fixes and improvements."
"Scalable, stable, and easy to deploy APM tool which effectively monitors code-level visibility."
"It helps us prioritize application performance issues. It has assisted triage where we can drill down and see where exactly the problem lies."
"In terms of stability, it has been stable so far."
"Standard available reports provide us with an automatic insight into the top ten situations to watch. It would have been extremely difficult to program such a report ourselves, and to my knowledge no other competitor can match this functionality."
"There may be some older technologies that are still covered, however, it's not as plug-and-play. You can still do it, however, it takes slightly more effort for engineers to cover old technologies such as C++, Delphi, and so on. It still can be done. It's just not as easy as, for example, covering Java."
"The way the agentless monitoring and agent monitoring get used is to be decided by the user, but there is no clarification on the setup phase or on how and why to use the aforementioned options."
"I would like to see accommodation for millisecond granularity, as we only have one-second granularity now."
"In terms of improvements we would like to see, we want to understand what the battery consumption metrics are whenever a user is viewing. It would be really helpful for us if we could get those details levels."
"The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to release updates, prompt users to upgrade, and inject code into the backend. It would be beneficial if there were a method to intercept these calls without requiring users to download and upgrade the application. However, I'm unsure about the feasibility of such an approach."
"I would like to see a better way to automate actions based on the events generated by the tool."
"CEM needs to be simplified, because it causes too many interruptions in our daily work."
"The area of improvement is related to the areas of application onboarding and instrumentation, where the product has certain shortcomings."
"I think as we're all moving forward to automated deployments, it'd be nice to have that out-of-the-box with this product."
"The solution still needs the administrator of APM to know a lot more to configure and control everything. So it's a headache for the administrator to do the daily jobs."
"It doesn't have a proper database, and the configuration is very difficult."
"The reason it's not a ten is because they don't focus enough on improving over time like other competitors do who have a more modern and complete tool."
"The APM upgrade procedure is a bit complicated with compatibility issues which can emerge like between agents and EM/Collectors."
"The upcoming changes for the deployment process of the agent will help a lot, in that others have gotten to that point first."
More AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is ranked 5th in Mobile APM with 6 reviews while Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 22nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 161 reviews. AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is rated 8.2, while Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring writes "Offers insights into peak usage hours, the application's status, and that of secondary services, such as databases and APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is most compared with , whereas Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, New Relic and BMC TrueSight Operations Management.
We monitor all Mobile APM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.