We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Coralogix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can make custom alerts in our system for specific issues like high CPU utilization or application downtime."
"I think the performance and interface are the most important features."
"After we implemented this solution, we can easily determine the root cause of issues."
"The flow map is very valuable to us. Before we installed APM, we had no idea how our application looked."
"The transaction snapshots let you find out where the application broke; it pinpoints where in the call stack, and then how long it took to resolve."
"The most valuable feature is having our services being available and healthy."
"The AppDyniamics technical support is good. We haven't had any problems with them. They answer very quickly."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the fact that it is very easy to use, making it easy to implement...It is a very stable solution."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"As per my experience, the drill-down feature can be improved at the class level."
"Their agents sometimes claim to be very lightweight, especially with databases, but they are very heavy. They can take up more compute than the actual work that we need to do."
"The cloud licensing needs to be improved. It's quite pricey."
"The initial setup could be easier."
"There could be some improvement in the constructions of the diagrams, it is too difficult currently."
"Sometimes, it is hard to navigate through and find if something is wrong or figure out where an error stemmed from."
"The agent deployment could be simplified by, for example, adding a GUI."
"It could do with more than one data centre/multiple AWS accounts in a pane of glass. Also, improved scalability to large environments would be helpful."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 155 reviews while Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Coralogix is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our AppDynamics vs. Coralogix report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.