We performed a comparison between Aqua Cloud Security Platform and Check Point CloudGuard Code Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two DevSecOps solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The container security element of this product has been very valuable to our organization."
"Aqua Security helps us to check the vulnerability of image assurance and check for malware."
"The most helpful feature of Aqua Security is Drift Prevention, which is a feature that allows images to be immutable. In addition, one of the main reasons we went with Aqua Security is because it provides strong protection when it comes to runtime security."
"The DTA, which stands for Dynamic Threat Analysis, allows me to analyze Docker images in a sandbox environment before deployment, helping me anticipate risks."
"The CSPM product is great at securing our cloud accounts and I really like the runtime protection for containers and functions too."
"Customers find it invaluable to have the ability to check for vulnerabilities in an image before deployment, similar to a sandbox environment."
"Support is very helpful."
"From what I understand, the initial setup is simple."
"Compared to what we used before, it's helping us to be more efficient in managing our traffic."
"We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events."
"We have a strong sense of security assurance when utilizing CloudGuard, as it consistently delivers outstanding protection capabilities."
"Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development."
"The implementation of this tool for security management and control is very simple."
"You can maintain a legal framework structure at all times."
"Knowing what measures we must take allows us to reduce costs associated with security in the cloud by providing early identification of a risk or a possible security breach."
"Automation has helped a lot to identify and automatically execute policies, rules, and blocks due to its machine learning."
"Sometimes I got stressed with the UI."
"Aqua Security could provide more open documentation so that their learning resources can be more easily accessed and searched through online. Right now, a lot of the documentation is closed and not available to the public."
"Aqua Security could improve the forwarding of logging into Splunk and into other tools, it should be easier."
"It's a bit hard to use the user roles. That was a bit confusing."
"In the next release, Aqua Security should add the ability to automatically send reports to customers."
"I would like Aqua Security to look into is the development of a web security portal."
"The solution could improve user-friendliness."
"The user interface could be improved, especially in terms of organization and clarity."
"They could include web functionalities such as sandboxing."
"We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development."
"The costs are not transparent."
"The enhancements are needed in the logging system and log management processes."
"This is a highly technical solution for users who do not have security experience. It requires specialized knowledge of configurations to use it correctly."
"There needs to be better security around API integration."
"There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the scope of what necessarily their product is."
"The ease of use could be better."
More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aqua Cloud Security Platform is ranked 5th in DevSecOps with 16 reviews while Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is ranked 7th in DevSecOps with 11 reviews. Aqua Cloud Security Platform is rated 8.0, while Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Aqua Cloud Security Platform writes "Reliable with good container scanning and a straightforward setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security writes "Good security and functionality with helpful support". Aqua Cloud Security Platform is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Snyk, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and SUSE NeuVector, whereas Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is most compared with Snyk and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention. See our Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security report.
See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.
We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.