We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Code Security and Snyk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two DevSecOps solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Having a cloud detection response helps to very quickly identify security threats in our environment."
"The implementation of this tool for security management and control is very simple."
"Automation has helped a lot to identify and automatically execute policies, rules, and blocks due to its machine learning."
"We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events."
"Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development."
"Knowing what measures we must take allows us to reduce costs associated with security in the cloud by providing early identification of a risk or a possible security breach."
"Check Point CloudGuard Code Security helps to improve the code security of our company, generating rapid and complete assessments to be able to make decisions for improvements."
"You can maintain a legal framework structure at all times."
"Our overall security has improved. We are running fewer severities and vulnerabilities in our packages. We fixed a lot of the vulnerabilities that we didn't know were there."
"There are many valuable features. For example, the way the scanning feature works. The integration is cool because I can integrate it and I don't need to wait until the CACD, I can plug it in to our local ID, and there I can do the scanning. That is the part I like best."
"The code scans on the source code itself were valuable."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Snyk is a developer-friendly product."
"I find SCA to be valuable. It can read your libraries, your license and bring the best way to resolve your problem in the best scenario."
"The solution has great features and is quite stable."
"The most valuable feature is that they add a lot of their own information to the vulnerabilities. They describe vulnerabilities and suggest their own mitigations or version upgrades. The information was the winning factor when we compared Snyk to others. This is what gave it more impact."
"There needs to be better security around API integration."
"There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the scope of what necessarily their product is."
"They could include web functionalities such as sandboxing."
"The enhancements are needed in the logging system and log management processes."
"We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development."
"This is a highly technical solution for users who do not have security experience. It requires specialized knowledge of configurations to use it correctly."
"I would like this solution to be extended to cellular devices or tablets."
"The costs are not transparent."
"The product is very expensive."
"I think Snyk should add more of a vulnerability protection feature in the tool since it is an area where it lacks."
"Compatibility with other products would be great."
"It would be helpful if we get a recommendation while doing the scan about the necessary things we need to implement after identifying the vulnerabilities."
"A feature we would like to see is the ability to archive and store historical data, without actually deleting it. It's a problem because it throws my numbers off. When I'm looking at the dashboard's current vulnerabilities, it's not accurate."
"DAST has shortcomings, and Snyk needs to improve and overcome such shortcomings."
"The tool needs improvement in license compliance. I would like to see the integration of better policy management in the product's future release. When it comes to the organization that I work for, there are a lot of business units since we are a group of companies. Each of these companies has its specific requirements and its own appetite for risk. This should be able to reflect in flexible policies. We need to be able to configure policies that can be adjusted later or overridden by the business unit that is using the product."
"One area where Snyk could improve is in providing developers with the line where the error occurs."
More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is ranked 7th in DevSecOps with 11 reviews while Snyk is ranked 1st in DevSecOps with 41 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is rated 8.4, while Snyk is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security writes "Good security and functionality with helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snyk writes "Performs software composition analysis (SCA) similar to other expensive tools". Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is most compared with Aqua Cloud Security Platform and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas Snyk is most compared with SonarQube, Black Duck, GitHub Advanced Security, Fortify Static Code Analyzer and Veracode. See our Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. Snyk report.
See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.
We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.