We performed a comparison between Arcserve UDP and Veritas NetBackup based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the duplication."
"The ability to switch between different hardware platforms and utilization tools are some of this solution's most valuable features."
"The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too."
"Our customers are happy with the product’s functionality."
"The most valuable feature of Arcserve UDP is live replication."
"Arcserve UDP has a good configuration and user interface. It makes the job of an administrator easy."
"The ease of use is the best feature of the product."
"One of the things that I do like about it is that it has a very good deduplication feature."
"I like the virtual server backup."
"The client side deduplication reduces the backup window."
"The Dedup and file storage is great."
"Great deduplication feature."
"I am comfortable with using this product."
"The solution is stable."
"It was especially useful with the appliances we use on a daily basis."
"Veritas released a new feature in version 8 of NetBackup called VRP. It's kind of like replication management from VMware. The great thing about this feature is that Veritas gave it to us for free."
"The time to backup servers that sit in DMZ must be improved."
"The support could be more knowledgeable and faster."
"I had an issue with Arcserve UDP during the failover and the secondary machine didn't get back online, even though it ran automatically. I faced the issue during a crisis situation. However, I haven't faced such a problem again."
"We have to use a Microsoft hypervisor for installation which is expensive."
"I don't know whether the tool has VMware integrations. It would be good to cover this area if it doesn't have those."
"The tool doesn't provide cloud integration in India."
"The initial setup was complex."
"It should be easier to switch between backup locations. We have multiple data storage locations and sometimes one of those storages need to be replaced. It would be nice if they made it easier to reconfigure the backup configuration."
"The solution could improve by having a feature to backup iSeries workloads."
"I think reporting can always be improved."
"It's a little bit complex to manage."
"The solution is not that stable because it has to be monitored and administered every day. The stability could be improved."
"The licensing costs could be more affordable."
"I have been involved in upgrades. They have not been straightforward. Some of them have required us to make changes to our architecture and production environment."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The product must enable data migration from on-premise to the cloud."
Arcserve UDP is ranked 18th in Backup and Recovery with 42 reviews while Veritas NetBackup is ranked 5th in Backup and Recovery with 112 reviews. Arcserve UDP is rated 7.6, while Veritas NetBackup is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Arcserve UDP writes "Global deduplication, stable, and flexible licensing options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas NetBackup writes "Efficient data recovery and replication features ". Arcserve UDP is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Acronis Cyber Protect, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Veritas Backup Exec and Azure Backup, whereas Veritas NetBackup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veritas NetBackup Appliance, Azure Backup and Veritas Backup Exec. See our Arcserve UDP vs. Veritas NetBackup report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.