We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is serverless so it allows us to transform data while optimizing the cost and performance of Spark jobs."
"AWS Glue is fast and managed by AWS. Hence, you don't have to worry about capacity and the performance of Glue jobs. It has integrations with other data stores of AWS. The product offers metadata management, logging, and ETL processing capabilities. It comes with a powerful feature, Glue Studio, which helps to do queries interactively within the community. It is a managed service and very secure. Another popular and mature service is S3."
"We have found it beneficial when moving data from one source to another."
"AWS Glue's most valuable features are the data catalog, including crawlers and tables, and Glue Studio, which means you don't have to use custom code."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is its ease of use and good documentation. Additionally, we can do all the transformations that we need."
"The key role for Glue is that it hosts our metadata before rolling out our actual data. This is the major advantage of using this solution and our clients client have been very satisfied with it."
"AWS Glue's best features are scalability and cloud-based features."
"The solution is highly user-friendly, and its features are easy to use. The new addition of AWS Glue Data Catalog is also very beneficial, making the tool even more helpful for its users."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."
"The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration."
"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."
"In my opinion, SAP PO is the most mature suite of tools to integrate processes across SAP environments at this moment. It's really unbeatable because it allows you to integrate whatever scenarios you can imagine."
"I rate the product's setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy since it is a very easy process."
"SAP Process Orchestration is middleware where we are able to manage and interact with everything from a single location. One of the most beneficial areas is monitoring which is very easy because it is all in one place. There are many adapters added recently that can be used for new functionality. The solution is easy to operate and it is more mature than the cloud solution provided by SAP."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."
"It is simple to transfer files."
"I would like to see a more robust interface on the no-code side. This would be nice to be able to split cells."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"The technical support for this solution could be improved. In future, we would like to connect more services like Athena or Kinesis to help control more loads of data."
"I haven't looked into Glue in terms of seeking out flaws. I've not come across missing features."
"In terms of improvement, the performance of AWS Glue could be faster."
"The setup and installation is a bit complex without advanced knowledge or training."
"The solution's visual ETL tool is of no use for actual implementation."
"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."
"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."
"SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes."
"SAP needs to improve a lot in terms of the orchestration part so that more adapters can be provided to users, which are areas where the solution has downsides."
"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."
"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life."
"The cloud capability features need improvement."
"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, webMethods Integration Server and IBM B2B Integrator. See our AWS Glue vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
