We performed a comparison between Azure Cost Management and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Cloud Cost Management."It has predictive analysis. It can forecast based on the costs associated with the particular architecture and how often they use it, estimating how much they'll spend."
"Cost management is the console's most valuable feature."
"The product provides visibility into what we are consuming."
"We use the solution as a cost management tool to control the budget. It is easy to mange costs with the product."
"During the two years I've been working with this solution, it has only been down once or twice. Thus, I would rate the stability of the solution at nine out of ten."
"Our customers use it and like it."
"It encompasses a multitude of specialized services, each with its associated costs and considerations."
"I like the fact that you can set alerts on the predicted cost in Azure Cost Management."
"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"The power flow is great."
"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."
"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."
"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."
"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."
"Azure Cost Management is expensive."
"I haven't detected anything that needs improvement, but any solution could be improved."
"I would like to have added to Azure Cost Management, drill down features from within the cost analysis reporting."
"There are significant issues with Power BI integration at the moment, particularly with built-in applications for course management. Multiple features don't allow for efficient report generation. This is one primary concern. The second issue relates to reporting, even when using Power BI templates for course management. There are problems with data import that require manual entry. So, these are the two main challenges I'm currently facing. Another matter to consider is the removal of the markup option for partners. I'm not sure if it will be added back, but it used to allow marking up Azure usage for enterprise customers. I'm uncertain if there's an alternative way to achieve the same function. Partners need to mark up services when selling to customers, and it's currently unavailable for some products or services."
"All the offers should be on the console. You shouldn't need to select from different tabs."
"There are certainly areas for improvement in terms of labeling the inventory. That's because right now, we use a number of services. But it's difficult when you look at the billing limiters and how they are named. We can't correlate those names to the actual services there. So, I can't click on an item and see if I'm still using this service or not. So it just rolls up and gives me values and figures, but I can't really correlate them to actual services on the Azure platform."
"What would make Azure Cost Management better is a more flexible GUI that would allow users to provide more input. Another area for improvement in the solution is its reporting. The report it provides should be easy to understand."
"The solution could improve its APIs to access the customer application."
"It was challenging onboarding users."
"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."
"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."
"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."
"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."
"They need a little more self-service."
Azure Cost Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Cost Management with 41 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 12th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 42 reviews. Azure Cost Management is rated 8.0, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "A good, but limited cost information solution with strong analytics but requiring more flexibility in its reporting functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". Azure Cost Management is most compared with IBM Turbonomic, Cloudability, AWS Savings Plans, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and Zabbix, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and Zabbix.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
