We performed a comparison between Barracuda Web Application Firewall and Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The initial setup is easy."
"There is no one special feature, but the WAF itself is valuable: user-friendly protection against web attacks etc., authentication, reporting, accountability, alerting, and hardened OS."
"It allows us to scale out to multiple phase servers."
"The solution ensures layer seven is secure from attacks."
"It's very simple and predictable, because Barracuda provides a vision of the current state of your application. It gives you an understanding of what is happening on your site and any attempts against you at your source. This is the main value that Web Application Firewall provides our company. These aspects are also the main reason for this documentation process."
"Some of the most valuable features are the ease of deployment, the Barracuda support, the easy-to-use console, and the granularity of the reports."
"I find the solution very stable."
"Our customers value the solution's simplicity."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes."
"They should improve their features, so they easily compare to the competition."
"As most people are aware, the implementation is not easy."
"It is not stable nor mature."
"If you know nothing about networks, then you can't set it up."
"The platform's pricing needs improvement."
"I would like to see an improved capacity to store logs so that they will be available for a longer time."
"We encountered a few glitches while implementing API security features into the product."
"I would suggest that someone implementing this product is knowledgeable in the IT field, and with the network needs. It is complex."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else."
More Barracuda Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is ranked 14th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 38 reviews while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is ranked 44th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Barracuda Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Web Application Firewall writes "Provides strong issue discovery capabilities; enhance the security parameters of web applications and suitable for medium to large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". Barracuda Web Application Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy and Kemp LoadMaster, whereas Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), NGINX Plus, Citrix NetScaler, Avi Networks Software Load Balancer and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.