We performed a comparison between Bitbar and SmartBear TestComplete based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"The solution has a very nice interface."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps."
"Selenium integration."
"The ease-of-use and quality of the overall product are above average."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to integrate with Azure DevOps for continuous integration and deployment."
"Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well."
"TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good."
"It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"The pricing is the constraint."
"Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work."
"SmartBear products generally have a weak link when it comes to integration with other test management tools like Inflectra."
"The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools."
"The initial setup of SmartBear TestComplete was complex."
"To bring it up to a 10, I would be looking for the addition of some key functional API testing."
"During the distribution of our regression test cases, the control IDs are not always recognized correctly."
"Headless testing would be a big improvement."
Earn 20 points
Bitbar is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 71 reviews. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "A stable product that needs to improve its integration capabilities with other test management tools". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting, LambdaTest and Perfecto, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Ranorex Studio, OpenText UFT One and Selenium HQ. See our Bitbar vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
