We performed a comparison between Bitbar and BrowserStack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"BrowserStack has lots of devices to choose from."
"The speed of the solution and its performance are valuable."
"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."
"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."
"We like the model device factory for iOS and Android devices."
"The integration is very good."
"The most valuable feature of BrowserStack is the ability to do manual testing."
"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."
"One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have your network set up by the book, it's hard to get it to work with local desk machines."
"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."
"We are struggling to do local testing."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"I would like to see clearer visibility."
"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."
"We had some execution issues."
Earn 20 points
Bitbar is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools while BrowserStack is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while BrowserStack is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". Bitbar is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting, LambdaTest and Perfecto, whereas BrowserStack is most compared with LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and Appium.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.