We performed a comparison between Bizagi and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The approval process is simple."
"The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products."
"The most valuable feature is that it is compatible with Visual Studio and .NET, and we can program it. Its speed is very good, and it is also stable and easy to deploy."
"Bizagi is a very useful tool because it does not require you to program. The user logic is very easy to understand even for people who are not engineers or developers."
"Very, very stable."
"Bizagi is simple. It's simple to learn."
"What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand."
"The API is pretty straightforward."
"The most important features of this tool are its visual modeling capabilities and drag and drop functionality. You can see what you are coding which makes it easy to understand and maintain. They have also created a big revolution in digital transformation by introducing native mobile app development under the same IDE."
"Refactoring with TrueChange is very simple."
"Scalability proved to be an exceptionally beneficial feature."
"Once built, web/mobile components can be reused in all new developments. In addition, the OutSystems Forge is very useful. We can exchange components and even already-built applications, reducing costs to build specific solutions."
"The solution helps to build mobile and web applications on SOAP and REST. You can integrate it with backend systems by submitting a code."
"Speed of delivery: We were able to reduce development time by 30%."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"It is easy to use."
"I would like to see the automation process included in the next release."
"It would be helpful if they added some extra features in the next update."
"Difficult to export in formats other than PDF."
"The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file. The performance is an issue for us."
"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."
"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."
"Bizagi could be improved by more automation and machine learning. Now that I'm learning more about data analyzers, I'm realizing that many people have problems with data and how to understand them."
"The on-premise software has some bugs."
"When shared extensions are updated, all the applications are redeployed."
"The resource availability needs to be increased."
"Mobile apps need improvement."
"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."
"In OutSystems, cloud management is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It's difficult to do the component version control. I would like them to add more studying materials."
"The prices should be lower. It is a little bit too high for a small market."
"The largest obstacle currently associated with OutSystems is its high cost and limited availability of skilled personnel. Despite being a rapid application development platform, having a highly skilled individual familiar with the platform can be much more beneficial than an inexperienced individual. Because there is a shortage of people with the necessary OutSystems skills, utilizing the platform can become expensive. This makes little sense, considering that a rapid application development platform should be accessible to the average person. However, having a highly skilled individual can greatly increase productivity, making the cost worthwhile."
Bizagi is ranked 10th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 78 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and Apache Airflow, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and QuickBase. See our Bizagi vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
