We performed a comparison between BMC Remedy and VMware Service Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers some very good features."
"This product is good because it allows us to receive proper responses to business emails anywhere and anytime. It helps in effective communication with employees. The solution is stable. The product is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward. I recommend BMC Remedy, especially for its automation capabilities."
"There are a lot of features a customer can use. It’s an existing concept of asset management. One feature is the ability to create tickets for various computer systems, VPN defenses, sites, regions, or customers."
"The incident management console is available out of the box."
"We can create our own profile in BMC Remedy, track how many tickets we've closed on a daily basis, monitor how many SLAs we've escalated, and see how many tickets we've received daily."
"The most valuable feature of BMC Remedy is to take administrative access of a user."
"The service management features are beneficial – very good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution includes all of its components since they act as the authentication system of the product."
"It provides us with improved maintenance cycles."
"All of the features are very suitable for us. It is also a stable solution."
"We have installed a physical server for failover. We need to configure cluster on everything. But with VMware, we do not need to cluster. We get automatically seven physical nodes failover. If one fails we have no issues."
"There is room for improvement in integration with various platforms. The support services should be improved. The response time from the support team should be faster."
"I would like to have more customized reporting because the management team loves customized reports with graphs."
"The upgrade process could be better. It would be a good improvement."
"The desktop technicians face some challenges with the solution."
"Integration and deployment could be better. It could be easier and faster to integrate and deploy. It would also help if we could have a 360-degree view. It would be better if they changed it to a SaaS type of offering, which is becoming the standard."
"BMC works through intermediaries or vendors for support, so you don't always interact with BMC directly. The quality can vary depending on the specific vendor."
"There is room for improvement regarding the customization as it tends to lag in terms of flexibility, particularly in comparison to competitors."
"Continuous improvement is recommended."
"It needs to improve user roles and access rights."
"Not a ten because the price is high."
"Its automation feature needs improvement. They can include the vRealize Automation feature in this solution."
Earn 20 points
BMC Remedy is ranked 5th in IT Asset Management with 23 reviews while VMware Service Manager is ranked 23rd in IT Asset Management. BMC Remedy is rated 8.0, while VMware Service Manager is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of BMC Remedy writes "Offers automation, orchestration, service level management but lacks AI-based rules ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Service Manager writes "It needs to improve user roles and access rights. It provides us with improved maintenance cycles". BMC Remedy is most compared with ServiceNow, BMC Helix Discovery, Snow License Manager, Qualys VMDR and ManageEngine IT Asset Management, whereas VMware Service Manager is most compared with . See our BMC Remedy vs. VMware Service Manager report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors and best License Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.