We performed a comparison between Board and CCH Tagetik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."BOARD technical support is knowledgeable and helpful."
"The drill down is good for people who have that high level view, because they can do some analysis based on it."
"Our clients have improved a lot in terms of coordination and communication. This has improved their internal performance."
"The tool seems to have a lot of ways to handle scaling."
"The ability to create a data model and have it in testing within a week is fantastic."
"Instead of taking two people a week each month to perform our internal KPI reporting, the same two people can have it done in a day."
"The dynamic selections on the screen and details by function are also valuable for inside the data view."
"The ease of being able to get the data into BOARD is what makes it nice for people with a semi-IT background."
"I've primarily worked with CCH Tagetik as a consultant, handling implementations and not providing day-to-day user support. I initially appreciated the unified platform, the Ownership Structure Register, which benefits certain entities. The workflow feature is great, but it can become overly detailed and lacks clear guidance on design. The solution is good in terms of storage."
"Has an APM, which deals with the details of data and has calculation functions included."
"I appreciate its user-friendliness, especially for business users who may not be very tech-savvy."
"The most valuable feature of CCH Tagetik is form creation."
"We are looking for ways to distinguish zeros versus nulls in BOARD."
"It's very powerful, but there is also a big learning curve. It should be a little more intuitive."
"It would be nice to be able to host your site and actually have BOARD be the driver of your site. So you could have anybody in your organization go to www.myorg.com, for example, and then go through what you allow them to go through. So rather than having to go through the application, to be able to go to actually host it to a website."
"Some of our users are still using an MS Office add-in for Excel for certain calculations, and when they export from Board, some of the values, some of the totals and column names, are not coming through into Excel."
"We would like to see better logging in the procedural world."
"The setup was a bit complex."
"Building similar models entirely from scratch could be made quicker with transfer abilities between databases and capsules."
"I'd like to see a more passive report user for enterprise report writers that aren't particularly technical."
"There is room for improvement, especially on the settings side of the solution."
"Analytics function is weak. Other products have sum(irate) function and forecasting help function, but Tagetik does not have this clarity."
"The tool's major drawback is the ETL process, which is not up to par with other solutions."
"We faced difficulties while uploading data."
Board is ranked 11th in Business Performance Management with 35 reviews while CCH Tagetik is ranked 13th in Business Performance Management with 6 reviews. Board is rated 8.6, while CCH Tagetik is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Board writes "A stable solution with good user-experience, easy deployment but needs some improvement with engine ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CCH Tagetik writes "User-friendly performance management with intuitive approach". Board is most compared with Anaplan, SAP Analytics Cloud, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion and Jedox, whereas CCH Tagetik is most compared with SAP Business Planning and Consolidation, Oracle HFM, Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion and Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud. See our Board vs. CCH Tagetik report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
