We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Jitterbit Harmony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"Documentation could be improved."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 13th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 13 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and AWS Glue, whereas Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Mule Anypoint Platform and SnapLogic.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hi,
If you are looking for a cost-effective solution you should look to the Google Cloud Platform. It offers a lot of possibilities and you only pay processing time.
We are using this platform to integrate data from SAP and other systems and are still discovering the possibilities of the platform. After 3 months of intensive development and testing with 4-5 people, the cost is not exceeding 250 Euro. Our knowledge when we started was nihil.
I don't thank you'll find a better engineered, well though out, and higher performing platform than Boomi. In conjunction with Boomi flow (formerly ManyWho) for BPM, Boomi can handle all of your integration needs. Probably the slickest offering on the market.
You have to clearly look at integration/data exchange patterns for real-time/ near real-time / batch between ERP and your client systems. An integration reference architecture identifying integration points is key. The tools highlighted don't sound they may check the box on everything. Key is rationalizing your patterns with the right fit for purpose stack
and conduct a few use case-based technology validations. I would say pick a client/clients for a pilot as well and keep evolving.
If you have a budget constraint, limit your validations to pilot clients, but use the reference architecture to guide integrations and validations.
I would suggest a lean DevOps with a CI/CD (Continuous integration/ Continuous delivery) construct to keep constantly delivering outcomes preferably with cloud. Only a cloud will give you the flexibility to start small and expand as you need.
This is the best answer I can give you given your situation. For more details, call me to discuss.
We are currently on-prem on Oracle ERP 11i and planning to migrate to Cloud Version. I have been looking at the middleware tools and finally want to go with Oracle PaaS technology with the Oracle Integration Cloud Services. I am not sure if Dell Boomi and Cast Iron could be leveraged to build complex integrations with the flexibility and scalability in mind. We have very many third-party integrations and wanted to embrace much reliable middleware that could be scalable in point of time. I wish to add, MFT services, API management, AI and ML to the existing as we move forward.
You could try SOACS or Apiary from Oracle. The licensing prices are available and can be checked into.
I would add SnapLogic into that mix but the three he listed along with SnapLogic are the top modern iPaaS platforms currently. Not sure what direction Salesforce will take Mulesoft.
SnapLogic is more of an enterprise scale solution and may be too expensive. I currently building the platform he references for my firm using an ecosystem approach as this area is complex and no one technology can cover all of it. We are focused on a microservices approach to delivering specific capabilities in each of the areas referenced below.
As considering the definitive cost factor, the only ESB (that I would use in that cost level) that has equal licensing costs comes from JBoss (or RedHat, if the commercial support is needed).
I have had now few projects where the RH’s Fuse has been used and it has been adequate to all customer requirements.
Personally, I have not any experience of the Jitterbit Harmony, so that also could solve your needs.
I’m not sure that would the Mule standard version fulfill all your needs, as usually, you have soon to get it’s Enterprise version to solve your needs/regs. But, otherwise, the Mule is very powerful also.
To my knowledge, the Mule Enterprise and Dell Boom do have a much higher price tag.
Thanks,
Art
IBM APP connect provides an integration hub for complex integrations inside
enterprise.
It offers cloud solution as well and is suitable to be the glue application
for no matter on-premise or cloud applications.
If a client needs to expose their API to external partners, I would like to
suggest another IBM product named APIC which is an API gateway similar to
Mulesoft AnyPoint listed below.
I would recommend to use Mulesoft AnyPoint and Runtime for your scenarios mentioned below
And also explore & follow API-Led Connectivity integration architecture, design & implementation approach during API Lifecycle (that can scale & reusable) and wish you also look into examples in MuleSoft Exchange to speed up the development process.
Search in MuleSoft Exchange for “Catalyst Accelerator for Retail” to look into reference API-led Connectivity implementation templates & RAML Specs.
From Cost perspective, please reach out to MuleSoft Sales team for negotiated prices.
Thanks!
Bharath