Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Boomi Logo
2,176 views|1,510 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
5,919 views|2,787 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool.""Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable.""It is easy to learn and implement.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems.""The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business.""It has been a stable product.""This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently.""I like the tool's optimization feature."

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Pros →

"I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code.""Connectors are very useful for streamlining data integration tasks.""The product’s most valuable feature is integration.""The tool’s biggest benefit is the access we have to other Azure products.""The product's most valuable feature is scalability.""The solution is very easy for new users because it includes very good documentation and transparency.""Logic Apps helped reduce complexity or development time. For example, if we get documents in the form of images, we can use Logic Apps to extract information from those images. This simplifies our efforts compared to originally using Microsoft APIs to do the same task.""If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pros →

Cons
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area.""There should be more scripting possibilities.""There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market.""There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow.""Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors.""They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect.""The product could be a little bit more user-friendly.""We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Cons →

"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features.""The solution could add an AI version to make it easier for people.""We wanted to use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, but we faced a timeout.""Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement.""There could be more AI features included in the product.""The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning.""Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could have more customization options for connectors.""Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The Platinum package is good for licensing, but I’m not sure about the cost and improvements."
  • "They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."
  • "The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."
  • "This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."
  • "The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."
  • "When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
  • "The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."
  • "Approximately 20k annually."
  • More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the solution could be cheaper."
  • "If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
  • "It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."
  • "Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."
  • "The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The pricing is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."
  • More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have worked as an Integration Architect/Developer for many years and have used Mulesoft, Boomi, Informatica, Workato, Celigo, SSIS and many other integration tools.  The tool you would pick depends… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for… more »
    Top Answer:Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.
    Top Answer:The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment.
    Top Answer:If we have P1 and P2 subscriptions, Microsoft will not charge us for creating applications on the Azure portal.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,176
    Comparisons
    1,510
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    397
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    5,919
    Comparisons
    2,787
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    477
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Boomi
    Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

    Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

    Sample Customers
    DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
    nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Outsourcing Company8%
    Retailer8%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Retailer6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company38%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization32%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Buyer's Guide
    Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 29 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report.

    See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.