We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the solution to be scalable."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"It has been a stable product."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"High throughput and excellent scalability."
"The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"It is a very stable product."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."
"The tool supports gRPC."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."
"Support is expensive."
"Technical support is an area where they can improve."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Azure Data Factory and AWS Glue, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.