We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the tool's optimization feature."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 9th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 4 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "Handles a wide variety of data sources and efficiently organizes and manages integration processes". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and AWS Glue, whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Zapier. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.