We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"It has been a stable product."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"Oracle provides great documentation."
"It can integrate with more recent databases like Cassandra, Hadoop, and other more recent Big Data databases."
"The tool improved our data integration workflow primarily due to its compatibility with Oracle. Its integration makes it very convenient for analytics. Its most valuable feature is robust extended capability. The solution's debugging capabilities are good."
"One of the standout features of ODI is its ability to prepare everything on a vertical level and create reusable components, which adds to its value."
"The scalability is great. It's one of the reasons we chose the solution."
"It's completely user-friendly."
"It allows us to use many languages to develop and to integrate practically all the technologies of the Oracle suite as well as those from non-Oracle vendors."
"The most valuable features of ODI are the ease of development, you can have a template, and you can onboard transfer very quickly. There's a lot of knowledge modules available that we can use. If you want to connect, for example, a Sibyl, SQL, Oracle, or different products, we don't have to develop them from scratch. They are available, but if it's not, we can go into the marketplace and see if there's a connector there. Having the connector available reduces the amount of hard work needed. We only have to put the inputs and outputs. In some of the products, we use there is already integration available for ODI, which is helpful."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"ODI could improve by being more user-friendly. Informatica, which is also an ETL tool, similar to ODI, but Informatica is very user-friendly, easy to use, and simple to integrate, compared to ODI. ODI has many features, put them all together, and sometimes we get confused about which ones to use, which ones not to use."
"The price needs to be lowered. It's too expensive."
"I rate it a seven out of 10 because there is room for growth because ODI is still new, in comparison to Informatica, which is a mature product."
"In our company, we haven't tried consuming services from IoT in our company yet, and I would like to know if the solution will support IoT services in the next release."
"There are certain things where it can be improved. Initial solution setup seems a bit complex at the start, it should be improved because it becomes bit tough for a novice to get started on this. Sometimes error description is not helpful to understand the problem it gives some generic type of errors which are at times not that helpful to understand the underlying root cause of the issue."
"The initial setup is a bit complex compared to other tools."
"Technical Support could be better."
"ODI could improve the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve to use the solution."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 67 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and AWS Glue, whereas Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and Oracle GoldenGate. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
