We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and FME based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."
"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."
"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."
"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."
"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."
"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."
"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."
"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."
"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while FME is ranked 24th in Data Integration with 5 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while FME is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FME writes "Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and AWS Glue, whereas FME is most compared with Alteryx Designer, Azure Data Factory, Talend Open Studio, SSIS and JumpMind SymmetricDS. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. FME report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
