We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and SnapLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"SnapLogic is an IPA tool that leverages a low code environment to connect to multiple sources, extract data, and store it in Azure data lake."
"What I found most valuable in SnapLogic is the ETL feature, particularly the Transform Snap Pack, for example, any kind of reading or writing on Transform Snaps. Other than that, all the third-party connectivity tools such as the SAP Snap Pack, Salesforce Snap Pack, Workday Snap Pack, even the ServiceNow Snap Pack, I find all those are pretty useful in SnapLogic."
"SnapLogice is a low-code development tool."
"SnapLogic is more user-friendly than Boomi in terms of debugging. You can move the mouse to a place, and it will record and show the data easily."
"The solutions ability to connect "snaps" or components to the graphic user interface is very intuitive, prevents errors, and makes implementations easy."
"The feature I found most valuable in SnapLogic is low-code development. Low-code development has been very useful for simple processes, which is required for business users such as extracting details from a file or getting things reported by calling your web service. Calling your web service also becomes easier with SnapLogic because of the snaps available, so if you have the documentation, you can call an API. You don't have to write all those clients to call an API, so that is another feature I found very easy in SnapLogic. Configuring and managing all the file systems also become very handy with the solution."
"Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently."
"You can use other languages, such as Python, and easily connect to other systems."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"SnapLogic should have some inbuilt protocol mechanism in order to speed up."
"They should expand in terms of features for SaaS-based market requirements in different sectors."
"Ultra Pipelines provides real-time ingestion but it needs some adjustment."
"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."
"It needs some more snaps. I would like to see some of the features be changed in some of the snaps."
"The problem is that SnapLogic doesn't offer a wide variety of connectors. For example, integrating with Salesforce is not that easy."
"The solution isn't ideal for complex processing or logic. We use another solution for that."
"The support is the most important improvement they could make."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while SnapLogic is ranked 6th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 21 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while SnapLogic is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SnapLogic writes "Easy to set up, easy to use, and is low-code". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas SnapLogic is most compared with IBM InfoSphere DataStage, AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. SnapLogic report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
