We performed a comparison between Bosch inubit and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."
"The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas."
"Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"It frankly fills the gap between IT and business by having approval and policy enforcement on each state and cycle of the asset from the moment it gets created until it is retired."
"High throughput and excellent scalability."
"A product with good API and EDI components."
"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."
"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."
"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."
"It would be nice if they had a change management system offering. We built our own deployer application because the one built into webMethods couldn't enforce change management rules. Integration into a change management system, along with the version control system, would be a good offering; it's something that they're lacking."
"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."
"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."
"The learning curve is a little steep at first."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Bosch inubit is ranked 42nd in Business Process Management (BPM) while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Bosch inubit is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bosch inubit writes "First Look – Bosch Software Innovations inubit Suite 6". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Bosch inubit is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi iPaaS.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.