We performed a comparison between Camunda and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"The solution is useful for small projects."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"Camunda is a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."
"It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success."
"The Camunda Modeler installation poses a challenge, requiring local installation, which doesn't help collaboration like other online tools, for instance."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, OutSystems and Appian. See our Camunda vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
