We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The support team responds fast."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"It is very stable."
"We have no complaints surrounding both the scalability and stability of this solution."
"Their out-of-the-box UI is quite good."
"We used almost all of the features, themes, styling guide, and approach components. They are useful in our applications."
"I really like the one-click publish feature in OutSystems. In other development tools/languages, it's not as easy. I also like how easily I can manage all my projects in one place."
"It is a stable solution, and the initial setup is straightforward."
"I like the mobile features the most, and there are also various features around the portal we created that I enjoy."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications."
"I think OutSystems needs to improve in many areas. First, sometimes Service Studio becomes really slow and even hangs for long periods. Also, if I have not published my module in some time, and some kind of Service Studio exception occurs, I lose my work."
"The dashboards in OutSystems could improve. There are a lot of tabs in the service center that can be confusing."
"The new version could be improved."
"There are many tutorials available but they are very basic and good for learning the platform. To develop an enterprise-grade application, advanced tutorials need to be developed to help IT professionals design/develop high-quality/performance applications."
"There are not enough resources on the market."
"In my opinion, the support and the pricing could be better."
"The initial setup is a little difficult."
KiSSFLOW is ranked 11th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 12 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Low-Code Development Platforms with 46 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Camunda, Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform and Bizagi, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our KiSSFLOW vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.