We performed a comparison between Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."Cisco ISE is a comprehensive solution that allows you to control access to network resources granularly based on policies."
"It integrates with the rest of our platform, like our firewall, and helps us a lot. It also does a good job establishing trust for every access request."
"It works as a good RADIUS server. It has lots of features. It works with all the proprietary Cisco AB pairs and features."
"The solution is great for establishing trust for every access request no matter where it comes from."
"A lot of customers use a third party to manage their guest Wi-Fi. Cisco ISE presents the ability to bring that in-house so that customers can have full control over it, change the branding, and get extra telemetry from it and the user data. It works really well for our customers."
"Cisco ISE now competes with any other product in the space because of its centralized and unified highly secure access control with ISE."
"For customers, it's great. It has a GUI, so the customers themselves can edit ACLs or even modify the policies. It's also an all-in-one solution with RADIUS and TACACS."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the policy sets."
"Keeper was user-friendly."
"A useful solution for storing encryption keys, programming and developing a SaaS platform."
"The installation and its use are very simple."
"Available for Windows platforms and also Mac OS and Linux systems."
"I like a couple of things about this solution. Being able to share passwords with other people is valuable. You can see if the information is out on the dark web and whether you have weak passwords and the last time they were changed. You could also have the 2FA or MFA codes embedded in the application so that you don't have to use your phone or any other 2FA device, which is something very important."
"Can create folders for specific types of information (i.e., work, personal, and school)."
"I can access my passwords from any Internet connected device."
"Chrome extension and app."
"Cisco ISE's performance could be better, faster, and more robust."
"The price here in Brazil is very expensive."
"The primary issue is the slowness of the application and the web interface. We have multiple admin nodes and app nodes. So when I need to get some information about a particular user, the GUI would take ten to fifteen seconds in loading when we need to know right away."
"I'd like to see an easier way to upgrade to larger versions, as well as more best practices that are easier to locate on their support page."
"The customer server was great but it would have been better for me if they had support in other languages such as Spanish."
"Some of the reporting could be improved."
"I think some areas where ISE could be better are perhaps in the number of integrations that they offer from a virtual standpoint, as well as having a better and more comprehensive pathway for the customer to go from a physical environment to a virtual one."
"ISE is a little clunky. The front-end feels like it is from the 1980s."
"The password rotation feature could be improved."
"Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps."
"Maybe a sort of category organizer to help with organizing passwords for different things, such as banking, medical, shopping, and school."
"I would add a category for personal documents or photos of ID cards."
"Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."
"Search functions are sometimes weird."
"Needs to improve KeeperFill on iOS."
"Rearranging folders via drag/drop functionality would be very helpful."
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control (NAC) with 137 reviews while Keeper is ranked 11th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault and LastPass.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.