We performed a comparison between Citrix ShareFile and Google Workspace based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Content Collaboration Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ShareFile gives you all of the features of cloud providers, but in an on-premises solution."
"This provides us with a secure way of sending tax returns without having to use passwords."
"Easy to manage and fully secure."
"The Enterprise Dropbox solution is highly integrated with Microsoft's Office 365 and Azure products."
"The solution is scalable."
"It's user-friendly for end users."
"Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."
"The solution would query the Active Directory, and if new accounts were identified, Citrix ShareFile would add them automatically."
"We haven't had any issues with scalability - we have over a thousand employees, and G Suite just scales."
"It's secure. It offers data security and user privacy. I use it for personal purposes. The interface is okay, and it's easy to use."
"The user interface is fantastic. It's also available for the individual person, so that's also a great thing about it."
"I have found the solution to be pretty stable."
"The solution's technical support is very good."
"If I'm addressing certain emails from banks — automatic emails, like OTP, etc. — I can create rules and forward that OTP to the specific email IDs. You can create rules and deliver mail to different groups using the forwarding feature. It's handy."
"The initial setup is easy because it's all pre-configured."
"It is quite a useful tool. It allows many people to work on a document. You can actually provide review comments and tag anybody to make the comment changes. You can also attach a document in Google Chat."
"DLP features are lacking and required because, especially with everyone working from home, security is now paramount when the data is on BYOD devices."
"The user interface is not very intuitive."
"Everything they have should be integrated into one item."
"Some of our customers are facing issues if they've deployed in hybrid mode."
"The configuration on the mobile devices is a little clunky, in terms of setting up the application."
"They should integrate the solution with more email services."
"There are sometimes scalability issues after updates."
"My only issue with this solution is the cost, which should be improved."
"I would rate the stability a five out of ten."
"Less customizations than there used to be."
"If your storage requirements in day-to-day work are large, then it will incur an additional cost since free storage is limited."
"The solution needs to be more user-friendly and improve its tools and features."
"In some cases, we are using the Google Meet functions but only when we have external clients. Internally, we are using Slack. Google Meet virtual meeting function is not as advanced as the one in Slack and should improve."
"It would be nice to have additional software, such as Microsoft Teams, since our basic edition, Google Meet, cannot record video."
"Scalability is not as good as we would like."
"The cost could be improved. It can sometimes be a bit confusing figuring out how we are actually being charged."
Citrix ShareFile is ranked 9th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 11 reviews while Google Workspace is ranked 3rd in Content Collaboration Platforms with 92 reviews. Citrix ShareFile is rated 8.4, while Google Workspace is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Flexible plans, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Workspace writes "If you misplace things, it's much easier to find them because of the search capability. ". Citrix ShareFile is most compared with SharePoint, Dropbox, Box, Microsoft OneDrive and SmartVault, whereas Google Workspace is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online, Amazon WorkMail, IceWarp, ProtonMail and HCL Notes. See our Citrix ShareFile vs. Google Workspace report.
See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
