We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."
"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"With the Process Center, I can go to one place and view what all the environments are doing."
"IBM BPM's most valuable features are its speed in implementing and providing any changes."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to customize your rules and put them inside the tool."
"The performance is fine."
"It is transparent to business users because it is mostly picture based modelling."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of IBM BPM."
"It is easy to take a requirement, put it in the code, and deploy it."
"Responsive Portal + Process Federation Server. This set of solutions offers a unified worklist to our customers."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"The pricing is a little bit high. It's gone up in cost."
"Some of the features are not enough for my business. We need to build custom user management for the many end users affected by BPM."
"It is not user-friendly."
"I'm hearing things might be improving, to really deliver on BPM as opposed to simply workflow. That really should be emphasized a lot more than it has been, because a lot of customers will simply implement the process and leave it there, because the product maybe doesn't emphasize BPM as much as it should, as much as maybe they talk about it in the sales process. The whole idea of BPM, is to iteratively improve the process, and in order to do that you have to have the analytics tool with it. A lot of times that doesn't go as far as it should simply because there's a lot more work to be done for that to happen, and just some sort of technical limitations that don't make that as easy as it should be."
"Performance on large scale requirements could also be improved."
"If you want to use IBM BPM, you will have to invest a lot of money for licenses and you need to learn that there are limitations in developing applications. You cannot create anything you want."
"They don't have a mechanism to achieve processes, data sources, and data."
"IBM BPM's UI is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 49th in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.