CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
One Identity Safeguard
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (6th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the market share of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 4.5% and it decreased by 9.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of One Identity Safeguard is 6.9% and it increased by 25.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
1.6%
 

Featured Reviews

David Morimanno - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 25, 2023
Good auditing and reporting but the ease of use could be better
The solution could improve: User experience and ease of use: The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate. Simplified policy configuration: Making the process of creating and managing policies more user-friendly can lead to better adoption and utilization. Integration and compatibility: Enhanced Integrations, Improving compatibility with a wider range of operating systems, applications, and devices can broaden the solution's scope and effectiveness. API and automation: Expanding API capabilities allows for more seamless integration into existing security workflows and automation processes. Threat intelligence and analytics and advanced threat detection: Incorporating more advanced threat detection mechanisms can help in identifying and mitigating potential security breaches. Analytics and reporting: Robust reporting and analytics features can provide insights into privilege usage, potential vulnerabilities, and overall security posture. Performance and scalability: Enhancements in performance, such as reduced latency and faster policy enforcement, can contribute to a more efficient endpoint management process. Ensuring the solution can handle a large number of endpoints without sacrificing performance is crucial for enterprises of varying sizes.
SA
Sep 26, 2023
Fast to implement and has good pricing but lacks documentation
We use the on-demand version. We use the solution for monitoring and connection to the customer's server for Windows and Linux It's easier to connect to the server and it makes it more secure. We've seen about a 40% improvement in that regard. The monitoring system is very good. It has a very…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."
"The product is stable."
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"It offers great performance."
"It has drastically reduced the attack surface for local administrative rights and the chance of escalation of privilege. We've removed, at this point, close to 98 percent of the local administrative accounts on workstations. If there were an incident, it would stop at that point and we'd be able to know."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"The product is very flexible"
"This is the number one product for privilege account security."
"Safeguard has the ability to record and retrieve in the full-video format."
"We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required."
"It is generally easy-to-use and install."
"I have found One Identity Safeguard to be stable."
"The customer service and technical support are very good."
"The whole product solves the privileged access management challenge for our company. We have a secure tunnel, a secure session manager, and automatic logging of sessions, which is good for forensic purposes. We have a rich level of logs and can trace what happened on which machine and see who did what."
"It's one of the best products we've seen. When you start looking at the functionality and use cases and usability of the product, it's straightforward. They designed this product with the end-user in mind, and they also had the sysadmin who is supporting the product in mind. They really did a nice job. Overall, it's a nice product to work with."
"The solution transparently integrates into the infrastructure and users do not notice it. I would give this feature the highest rating."
 

Cons

"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"They need much better integration with Azure AD."
"The price of the solution should improve."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"We can't review or audit HTTP and HTTPS. This functionality should be added so that we can review and audit HTTP and HTTPS."
"The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another."
"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy."
"Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service."
"We've had issues managing accounts and access to some data saved on the servers. Accounts are granted a new working certificate daily. We have an account to do it on APIs online and sync it with that. If the path changes at some point or someone changes the password, I don't know if it's from the Active Directory or what."
"The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0."
"On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight."
"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I feel that the price of the product is nominal. It must be around 10 to 15 USD per installation. I rate the product price an eight to nine out of ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."
"Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."
"licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."
"I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved."
"The solution's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors' products."
"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."
"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."
"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."
"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."
"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."
"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."
"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."
"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?
The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?
They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base. Usually, they start at one price, and when you start pricing the competition, you ...
What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?
Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts. This is always something you need people to do. It would be especially helpful when you h...
 

Also Known As

Viewfinity
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cavium
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.