We performed a comparison between Darktrace and Lumu based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Provides great network protection."
"The active threat dashboard is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"Darktrace's most valuable features are that it understands the network environment and is able to trace the traffic and alert on anomalies."
"The most valuable feature is that it gives us visibility of rogue traffic that is on the network."
"The most valuable feature is that it works autonomously."
"Darktrace is very flexible."
"The most valuable feature is the solution's ability to trim out the false positives and point your attention to the real important stuff."
"I have found the automation and AI features to be valuable. If someone were to come in to the office at midnight and log in, Darktrace would flag it."
"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."
"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."
"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."
"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."
"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."
"I would like for the product to work on the endpoints as well. I would like to see enhanced visibility into the endpoints and network but this solution only sits on the network itself."
"It could build in integrations for some complementary products, but it has an assistant plugin so this is not really a big deal."
"The interface and dashboards could be improved for ease-of-use."
"It can have more integration with orchestration or event management solutions. They can provide more knowledge or research information for analysts for investigating cases and detecting anomalies in networks."
"Darktrace could expand into EDR (endpoint detection and response) and combine it with its network detection."
"Its threat analyzer could be better. It should also have agents. They should improve this product by installing agents for the machine to get more visibility. Currently, they are monitoring only the network. They should also monitor the agents from inside. It should also have a better pricing plan because it is an expensive product."
"I would like to see some additional enhancements."
"I believe their network monitoring device licensing module could use some improvement."
"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."
"The reports need improvement."
"Nothing so far needs to be improved."
"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."
"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."
Darktrace is ranked 1st in Network Detection and Response (NDR) with 65 reviews while Lumu is ranked 6th in Network Detection and Response (NDR) with 5 reviews. Darktrace is rated 8.2, while Lumu is rated 9.8. The top reviewer of Darktrace writes "Great autonomous support, offers an easy setup, and has responsive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lumu writes "Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing". Darktrace is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Vectra AI, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Network Analytics, whereas Lumu is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Stellar Cyber Open XDR, LogRhythm NDR, Fortinet FortiGate IPS and Splunk User Behavior Analytics. See our Darktrace vs. Lumu report.
See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors and best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.