We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiGate IPS and Lumu based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have not had to reach out to FortiGate support yet and that is a pretty good track record."
"It is a good product. It does what we want it to do so. I didn't find many false-positives or things like that. We mainly use the IPS and URL filtering features, and they are pretty good."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The most valuable features are security and vision, and all of the UTM functionality."
"The GUI is the most valuable feature."
"It does not require a lot of maintenance."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"You have access to CLI in case you have no web access."
"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."
"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."
"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."
"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."
"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."
"The graphical interface could be improved."
"The user interface needs a bit of upgrading."
"We would like to see an improvement in the consistency of the product's performance levels."
"Right now, it's not really scalable, but it's okay for us. However, looking ahead to three years from now, we might have a problem with scalability. We foresee a little risk down the road. The stability is okay for now."
"FortGate's IPS reporting could be made better by giving more details regarding the source and destination of network traffic when it comes to the overview section. This would allow me to more easily follow the flow of traffic based on IP addresses, without having to integrate the IPS with other products that perform more sophisticated traffic analysis."
"Its performance can be better. We have had performance issues in the past, but we sometimes tend to find that it is more related to what we do in our network than anything else. It is quite a good product, and there isn't much to improve."
"The solution is not scalable."
"Whitelisting could be better."
"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."
"Nothing so far needs to be improved."
"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."
"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."
"The reports need improvement."
Fortinet FortiGate IPS is ranked 4th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 54 reviews while Lumu is ranked 13th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 5 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate IPS is rated 8.4, while Lumu is rated 9.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate IPS writes "Very stable with good network protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lumu writes "Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing". Fortinet FortiGate IPS is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco NGIPS, Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service, whereas Lumu is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Darktrace, Stellar Cyber Open XDR, LogRhythm NDR and Splunk User Behavior Analytics. See our Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs. Lumu report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.