We performed a comparison between Datadog and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has helped out organization gain improved visibility."
"The monitoring functionality, in general, and tagging infrastructure are great."
"If we have a large load for users using our basic Datadog, it will immediately fire off an alert notifying us either something's wrong or not."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the APM."
"The solution allows flexibility and heightened observability for presenting data, creating indicators, and setting service-level objectives."
"The most valuable aspects of the product include the APM and profiler."
"It has empowered all our platform engineers with a very powerful and easy to use monitoring system."
"Thanks to the logs, we manage to make better reports through Jira and also to trace the request with more facility than we would be able to do otherwise."
"The solution's initial setup process was easy...The technical support is good...It is a stable product, and we will use it for a long time."
"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."
"The best part is that you can integrate a two-way network. Earlier we could not manage the storage and ToR switch. Now we can create a LAN with our storage without any interface. In terms of switch management, it is now easy to understand the current configuration. It provides centralized management. It provides a single pane, and you can easily do all updates in one shot. It is a great product."
"Gives the business interfaces to view real-time pictures of IT business services."
"Gives us one platform to monitor and access or configure all the servers or the 3PAR, etc."
"We get templates, so it's speed to delivery for us. It's a big difference with the template features."
"We could literally swap out a piece of hardware, slide one back into the chassis, and immediately - about three reboots later - it was identical. We didn't have to worry about configuring it, we didn't have to spend any time getting anything into place. It came back and it healed the environment almost immediately."
"The OneView Global Dashboard is very user-friendly and it can be used for monitoring the power consumption and temperature of the data center and racks."
"The solution should provide alerts for cloud outages."
"I would like testing for data in the future."
"The incident management beta looks promising, but it is still missing the ability to automatically create incidents based on certain alerts."
"I found the documentation can sometimes be confusing."
"It can be overwhelming for new people as it has a lot of features."
"We need more advanced querying against logs."
"When I started using it years ago, it had stability problems. I remember, specifically, we ran everything in Docker containers. There were some problems getting it into a Docker container with very specific memory limits."
"The logging could be improved in the future."
"The solution's console can be improved by making it more user-friendly and adding the capability to filter the reports out using only the information required."
"We have a version 3 and a version 1.2, but the upgrade process from the 1.2 to the 3 is kind of an issue."
"Sometimes the interface can be a little confusing, sometimes the error messages can be very cryptic, as far as what's actually going on."
"Does not allow for switch configuration other than through OneView."
"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."
"I had some minor difficulties with upgrading, but the solution still works fine."
"The network configuration part of HPE OneView needs improvement. The solution has way too many features, and there's a need for proper configuration indicators to be put in place."
"We've had a few issues. We just upgraded to the 3.9.0 version. We think that now that we are on that version, hopefully a lot of those things are going to go away for us."
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and Icinga. See our Datadog vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.