We performed a comparison between Dell CloudIQ and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing about this solution is that you can check for the infrastructure and system updates that you might need to be compliant with the Cloud."
"Mobile application is the most valuable feature for us. We can monitor all the storages on our phones. It's really good."
"Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution."
"Has really nice roll-up dashboards."
"The tool for forecasting capacity is valuable."
"The remote support automatically logs service calls and support cases with HPE, which is really good."
"Administration-wise it's going to be easier. More smooth and more flexible."
"Just the ability to provision the servers with storage and network everything within one interface, not having to go into multiple interfaces to provision those pieces."
"The solution's technical support was great...The initial setup of HPE OneView was easy."
"Gives us one platform to monitor and access or configure all the servers or the 3PAR, etc."
"The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team."
"The OneView Global Dashboard is very user-friendly and it can be used for monitoring the power consumption and temperature of the data center and racks."
"The easy user interface was what I found most valuable in HPE OneView. For example, if I wanted to know the infrastructure status or I needed to send in any change commands, HPE OneView had simple buttons."
"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."
"In terms of improvement, they should enhance the product range."
"Doesn't do well in terms of integrating with technologies other than Dell."
"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."
"PowerScale is the only file system offered and that is limiting."
"I had some minor difficulties with upgrading, but the solution still works fine."
"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."
"One thing which is missing is that you can't actually log a support call yourself."
"Use it, but do not think it is going into the clouds, because it is not. There is room for improvement."
"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."
"It would be better if we can add every HPE device to OneView, such as MSA, as well as the other servers like the DL server and ML server."
"Sometimes the interface can be a little confusing, sometimes the error messages can be very cryptic, as far as what's actually going on."
"It needs more reporting capabilities."
Dell CloudIQ is ranked 41st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 5 reviews while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. Dell CloudIQ is rated 7.8, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell CloudIQ writes "Easily visualize your environment's performance and forecast its capacity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". Dell CloudIQ is most compared with Moogsoft, Cisco Intersight, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator, NetApp Cloud Insights and Zabbix, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator, ServiceNow IT Operations Management and SolarWinds NPM. See our Dell CloudIQ vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
