We performed a comparison between Datadog and ITRS Geneos based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Datadog is recognized for its intuitive interface, wide range of integrations, and helpful problem-solving capabilities. In contrast, ITRS Geneos receives acclaim for its adaptability, ability to be personalized, and ability to monitor data in real-time, making it a versatile and robust monitoring solution. Datadog has areas for improvement in various aspects including user-friendliness, integration, user interface intuitiveness, learning curve, security features, management of organizational structure, customization flexibility, AI and ML concepts, and agent deployment. ITRS Geneos could benefit from improvements in creating dashboards and enhancing the visibility of metrics, enhancing the deployment method for upgrading, providing intelligent analysis of log files, and improving mobile app accessibility.
Service and Support: While some users appreciate the helpful and responsive support from Datadog, others have encountered slow or unresponsive assistance. ITRS Geneos is highly praised for its customer service, with immediate responses and the ability to effectively resolve any issues. However, there have been occasional instances of communication gaps and language issues with ITRS Geneos.
Ease of Deployment: Users find the initial setup for Datadog to be straightforward and relatively quick, with a duration ranging from one hour to three days, depending on the complexity. They appreciate the helpful documentation and support provided. The initial setup for ITRS Geneos is seen as complex and time-consuming, often necessitating assistance from implementation experts. While it takes only a few hours to deploy the out-of-the-box form, creating the monitoring catalog can be a lengthy process.
Pricing: User opinion varies on the setup cost of Datadog, as the pricing model lacks clarity and documentation. ITRS Geneos has a straightforward licensing model and reasonable pricing. Additional costs may apply for add-ons and server setup.
ROI: Users find that Datadog provides time savings and faster debugging, while ITRS Geneos offers benefits such as reputation, cost savings, avoidance of downtime, and improved performance indicators.
Comparison Results: Datadog is the preferred choice when comparing it to ITRS Geneos. Users appreciate Datadog's simple setup process, helpful documentation, and user-friendly interface. They also value its wide range of integrations and flexibility in monitoring and analyzing data. Datadog's performance, observability, error reporting, log centralization, and dashboard features are considered valuable.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The CCM, Workflows, Logs, APM, and RUM are all useful aspects of the solution."
"The solution has offered increased visibility via logging APM, metrics, RUM, etc."
"Datadog documentation on web pages has improved a lot and is pretty easy to follow and find."
"Datadog has made it much easier to have a central place for people to look for logs and made it much easier to notify them of any elevated error rates or failures."
"The visibility into our network has allowed for quick diagnosis of failures, identification of underutilized or over-utilized resources, and allowed for cloud cost optimization opportunities."
"The visibility that it provides is valuable. It is helping in being proactive around incident management. It is helping us to be able to get more visibility into our customers' applications so that we can assist them at the application layer. We also provide them the infrastructure from an AWS standpoint. We are able to make sure that our customers are aware of certain critical things around the analytical piece of either the network or the application. We're able to call customers before they even know about the issue. From there, we can start putting together some change management processes and help them a bit."
"The feature I have found most valuable is when I can reuse existing monitors and alerts for new dashboards."
"The platform appeals to companies spanning many industries on a global scale."
"One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."
"This solution has helped provide relief to existing Level 2 teams, allowing them to focus efforts on in-depth problem analysis."
"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."
"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."
"The filtering in the Active Console is exceptional. Depending on the user base, some people don't want to see server-level errors, so we have filters set up in the Managed Entities view, which allow us to filter out things that certain groups don't want to see, while allowing them to see other things. It's a great real-time monitoring solution. And you can draw graphs immediately, right from the Active Console, whether they're current graphs or historical graphs."
"The flexibility of the product is most valuable. It is highly customizable. If you put your mind to it and think of something you could do, there's a good possibility you can get it integrated within the console, if it's not readily available. The simplicity or ease of customization has been valuable."
"In my experience, being able to monitor our databases is a valuable feature as we can create our own queries and aren't reliant on the in-built ones."
"This tool allows one to analyse, integrate and customize as per the systems and allows you to set your own rules."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The product could do better with its notifications."
"I've only been using Datadog for a few months, and at first, it was frankly overwhelming in terms of both the UI and the available capabilities."
"One thing we have run into is that it is so easy to add monitoring that we turn on things without really understanding the costs."
"As a new customer, the Datadog user interface is a bit daunting."
"The dashboard could be improved. It would be helpful to get a view of specific things that we need to monitor for our application."
"We would really like to see more from the Service Catalog."
"We would like to see smaller or shorter tutorials and video sessions."
"Their security features could be improved. We looked at their Security Monitoring feature but it was early in its development. Datadog are just getting into the security space so I'm sure this will improve in the future."
"Much of the reporting outside of the user interface is very basic and requires much customization to be useful."
"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."
"At the moment Geneos is excellent and handling real time monitoring, however not great at doing historical reporting."
"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."
"There is a part of the rules for monitoring alerts. I want to understand more about how to choose the samples and the requirements for the rules. That is the part that I want to understand better and get better training for."
"Sometimes, if there is a lot of data coming onto the servers, we have observed a little bit of slowness on the gateway servers which are doing the ITRS dashboard monitoring."
"I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself."
"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews while ITRS Geneos is ranked 11th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 57 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while ITRS Geneos is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ITRS Geneos writes "The flexible dashboard sets it apart from competing tools, but it's costly and lacks scalability". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas ITRS Geneos is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Grafana, Prometheus and Splunk Enterprise Security. See our Datadog vs. ITRS Geneos report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.