We performed a comparison between Datadog and ThousandEyes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The observability on offer is the most useful aspect of the product."
"The solution allows flexibility and heightened observability for presenting data, creating indicators, and setting service-level objectives."
"It has a nice UI."
"We like the distributed tracing and flame graphs for debugging. This has been invaluable for us during periods of high traffic or red alert conditions."
"APM is great and has provided low-effort out-of-the-box observability for various services."
"The CCM, Workflows, Logs, APM, and RUM are all useful aspects of the solution."
"Dashboards and their versatility are among the most valuable features."
"The integration and configuration are incredibly simple. The SaaS offering is remarkably easy to set up, especially if you're coming from a Graphite environment or anything that uses a StatsD."
"ThousandEyes gives companies better visibility."
"It's fairly easy to set up."
"The company provides excellent service."
"The most valuable feature of ThousandEyes is user-friendliness. It has been essential for us to have a solution that is easy to use."
"The most valuable features are integration and ease of use."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution was the ability to see how the connection quality is between the sites and get an alert if it was turning bad."
"The authentication overall - including to the VPN and LAN - is excellent."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"Datadog is expensive."
"We need more advanced querying against logs."
"More pre-configured "Monitor Alerts" would be helpful."
"As a new customer, the Datadog user interface is a bit daunting."
"They should continue expanding and integrating with more third-party apps."
"It would be nice to be able to graph metrics by excluding certain tags (like you can do in monitors)."
"The solution needs to integrate AI tools."
"Sometimes it’s difficult to customize certain queries to find specific things, specifically with the logging solution."
"It's an expensive solution."
"It might be practical to extend monitoring capabilities to include network devices"
"Presently, it lacks the ability to integrate with other Cisco products."
"ThousandEyes could improve the dashboards by adding more features."
"The guest portal is hard to use."
"The tool does not provide features for application-level monitoring."
"There is room for improvement in terms of customization and user-friendliness."
"They only offer synthetic requests."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 2nd in Network Monitoring Software with 137 reviews while ThousandEyes is ranked 12th in Network Monitoring Software with 11 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while ThousandEyes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThousandEyes writes "Reliable. simple to set up, and offers fast monitoring capabilities". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas ThousandEyes is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Accedian Skylight, Dynatrace, SolarWinds NPM and AppDynamics. See our Datadog vs. ThousandEyes report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.