We performed a comparison between Eggplant Performance and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Performance Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."
"We find the solution stable and scalable."
"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."
"What I found best in Tricentis NeoLoad is that it's better with scripting and load test execution in the load testing environment compared to its competitors. The tool has a better design, scenarios, and model, which I find helpful. I also found the Result Manager a fascinating part of Tricentis NeoLoad because of the way it collates results and presents reports. The straightforward implementation of Tricentis NeoLoad, including ease of use, is also valuable to my team."
"With the tool, it is possible to compare NeoLoad test results against baseline and benchmark, and we can make the comparisons in the same window."
"The dashboards give extensive statistics, which help with quick report preparation and analysis."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to execute parallel requests, unlike JMeter and LoadRunner which can only be run sequentially."
"NeoLoad is actually really good, mainly because they have a world-class support service."
"I would rate it as eight out of 10 for ease of setting up."
"From a functional perspective, the range of tools provided with Tricentis NeoLoad is perhaps the widest."
"It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing."
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."
"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."
"While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us."
"The solution’s pricing is higher compared to other tools. Though the product’s reports are accurate, it needs to be more detailed like other tools."
"The product must improve the features that allow integration with CI/CD pipelines."
"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."
"The UI lacks sufficient object rendering."
"It needs improvements in the UI. It's currently not as friendly as it should be."
"Tricentis NeoLoad crashes if an application contains more than 1,000 scripts."
"Connecting with the solution's technical support can be time-consuming. The turnaround time for a ticket raised is around 72 hours, which becomes an issue when working on a huge project in our company."
Eggplant Performance is ranked 15th in Performance Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 61 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 7.8, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes " Maintenance will be easy, pretty straightforward to learn and flexible". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Appium, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Tosca and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and Tricentis Tosca. See our Eggplant Performance vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.