We performed a comparison between ExtremeControl and Fortinet FortiNAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use."
"There is information on migrating most of the cloud system's features."
"The company also uses Cisco ISE in other places. I have been told that ExtremeControl is easier to use than ISE. The other reason we prefer ExtremeControl is stability. That's why they chose it for this big hospital in Oslo."
"I can know which end users are using which features."
"It has effectively enhanced network security and integrated with other security tools to streamline operations."
"Fortinet FortiNAC has good user account customization."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to protect devices connected to network service."
"The support responds to our queries within two to four hours."
"Provides good performance, is easy to use and configure."
"The solution is good at giving a deep dive into each product. It tells you, for example, what is connected to the network. It gives us good reporting tools."
"The tool provides us with a list of devices that tries to connect to our network. It offers us a lot of network visibility."
"The FortiNAC features I found the most valuable are security and the ability to consolidate wireless networks."
"Fortinet FortiNAC is both scalable and stable."
"One improvement could be better clarification, namely that the system only works optimally with all components purchased together."
"The installation is easy, it can take between five minutes to four hours depending on the complexity of the environment. The speed of the installation could improve for more complex environments."
"There isn't enough development for the on-premises controller."
"I'd like to have access to more information on the traffic passing through."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"I hope that Fortinet can add a feature with a remediation mechanism when you find a broken piece so that you can click on something and download the needed update or resolve the firewall issue more easily. Currently, we have to use an external remediation server to download updates."
"The course content could be improved, it's not that simple to work through."
"The reporting can also use improvement."
"The training documentation needs to be more transparent."
"Keeping the hard disk on the one series will be easier for the distributor and will keep the prices lower for the customer."
"The platform must enable troubleshooting."
"Fortinet FortiNAC could improve its hardware for use with cloud-based firewalls."
ExtremeControl is ranked 14th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 5 reviews while Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews. ExtremeControl is rated 7.2, while Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ExtremeControl writes "Has a simple setup process, but it could be affordable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". ExtremeControl is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Forescout Platform and Sophos Network Access Control, whereas Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and macmon Network Access Control. See our ExtremeControl vs. Fortinet FortiNAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.