F5 Advanced WAF vs The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) comparison

F5 Advanced WAF

Read 55 F5 Advanced WAF reviews

11,906 Views
9,375 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (po...

Read 3 The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) reviews

836 Views
630 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

F5 Advanced WAF

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (po...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between F5 Advanced WAF and The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 Advanced WAF vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report (Updated: March 2024).

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)

March 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,061 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

F5 Advanced WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (po...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the market share of F5 Advanced WAF is 15.0% and it increased by 34.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) is 0.9% and it increased by 86.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Unique Categories:

No other categories found

Featured Reviews

Richard Polyak

Sr. Architect at NBC Universal

Jun 24, 2022

Protects our environment and is easy to use and scalable for our needs

It protects our public entities. Its use case is very directed at a resolution of security It protects our environment. It protects our entities. Identification, ease of use, and ease of modifying it to most of our needs are valuable. There should be more ability to rate limit certain…

Read full review

reviewer2161107

Staff Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 6, 2024

Offers Varnish Configuration Language (VCL) and provides enhanced dashboards, making it easy to identify and allow or deny traffic based on the signals it provides

The initial setup was super easy. The migration was super easy. The only part we were missing was China cache. Other than that, it has everything Akamai was providing: image optimization, CDN, WAF, and all the other security aspects. The China cache was the one thing we were missing in Fastly, so we had to do it differently. Deployment was a few weeks for the migration. If you're starting a brand new site, it's straightforward; maybe in a week or two, you can be up and running. But if it's a migration from a different CDN, it would probably take four to six weeks. We wanted to know the caching rules and how teams were doing things differently, so we had each member from the team gather inputs. Then we migrated and started writing the VCL code. It's very little maintenance. But with every draft, you need to periodically check the dashboard for anomalies and take action. Once a month or once a quarter, you need to do that exercise. Moreover, there are a couple of integrations with other observability tools like Datadog and Slack. It's easy to enable access with SSL, Okta, and Flash teams.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of F5 Advanced WAF are the easy identification of events and customization. We can pinpoint our settings."

"The solution isn't too expensive. The license allows you to license what you need and leave out what you don't need."

"The solution uses AI to protect against botnet attacks."

"It also has antivirus and DDoS mitigation capabilities. We have enabled these features."

"Good dashboard and reporting."

"It is also quite intuitive and user-friendly. They have several webinars that are actually like labs. You can use these webinars to learn about how to use all features of the product."

"Very easy to implement and works well."

"The product has valuable features for load balancing, monitoring tools, and HPXpress services."

More F5 Advanced WAF pros

"When configuring a web application firewall using Signal Sciences, we configure a rule whereby no one except a few people can access the application."

"Fastly (Signal Sciences) integrates and tags the intermittent traffic based on patterns. It generates signals and provides them in a dashboard where we can view them and decide whether to allow or deny traffic. It's a more advanced and easy-to-navigate dashboard."

"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to set up the rules easily."

Cons

"People who want to work with the device have to be pro in Linux"

"The solution should include RASP for another level of protection at the code itself."

"F5 Advanced WAF could improve the reporting. It's a bit difficult to populate, them. If you're not so familiar with the functions, such as where to find the logs and other settings."

"They should work on the virtualization of NGINX."

"The solution is tedious. It takes a lot of discrete settings so one needs to get detailed and granular when they use the solution. It takes you a whole lot of energy and concentration to configure. It needs to be much more straight-forward, like other web solutions."

"The contextual-based component needs a lot of help to catch up with the next-gen products."

"The deployment side is quite complex."

"This solution can be made more user-friendly."

More F5 Advanced WAF cons

"Fastly don't support caching for China users. That's the only feature lacking compared to Akamai."

"Even if we create some custom rules, Signal Sciences cannot capture some of the malicious traffic."

"The areas that could be improved in Signal Sciences include the effectiveness of rules, as many didn't function optimally and required custom rule-writing to address bypasses for WAF."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"F5 bundles up services and the bundle is what you pay for rather than individual components."

"As far as the pricing of F5 Advanced WAF I would rate it a four out of five depending on what features I am looking for. Imperva is more expensive."

"The price of the solution is reasonable when compared with other products, such as FortiWeb. I am very satisfied with the price."

"There is a perpetual license that comes with your hardware. There is also an additional fee for support."

"F5 Advanced WAF technical support comes at a cost, and it's expensive."

"F5 Advanced WAF is not a cost-effective solution. Although they are attempting to reduce prices with their VE and cloud options, they are more expensive than other solutions. The solution is more expensive on average."

"There are different licenses available to use F5 Advanced WAF, such as BT, ASM, and LPM."

"Its price is fair. We have done a couple of deals where they were able to give some kind of discount to the customers. The price was initially high for the customers, but after a couple of negotiations, it came within their budget. They were happy with that."

More F5 Advanced WAF pricing and cost advice

"Signal Sciences is pretty cheap compared to other solutions."

"The pricing is 50% less than Akamai."

"The product has an affordable cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 Advanced WAF?

It's a fairly easy-to-use and user-friendly tool. My administrators and team also like its ability to customize the rules per the requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Advanced WAF?

The product is not so expensive. It depends on the assets.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 Advanced WAF?

The self-service aspect could be improved. The user interface (UI) also seems a bit outdated. Making it more user-friendly would be beneficial.

See all answers

What do you like most about Signal Sciences?

The product's most valuable feature is its ability to set up the rules easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signal Sciences?

The pricing is 50% less than Akamai.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Signal Sciences?

Fastly don't support caching for China users. That's the only feature lacking compared to Akamai.

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiWeb vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 17% of the time

AWS WAF vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 12% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 6% of the time

More F5 Advanced WAF Competitors

AWS WAF vs The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)

Compared 32% of the time

Cloudflare vs The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Web Application Firewall vs The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)

Compared 13% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)

Compared 9% of the time

More The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF

June 2024

Download F5 Advanced WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

May 2024

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) report

Download The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Signal Sciences Next-Gen WAF, Signal Sciences RASP

Learn More

Video not available

Fastly

Overview

F5 Advanced WAF is a web application security solution for financial and government sectors, e-commerce, and public-facing websites. It offers protection against various attacks, including botnets, web scraping, and foreign entities. The solution can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud and is often used with other security tools. Its most valuable features include DDoS and DNS attack protection, SSL uploading, anomaly detection, and the ability to input custom rules.

F5 Advanced WAF has helped organizations to expose more services to the public while providing an extra layer of protection, preventing revenue loss, and securing connectivity.

The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) provides web application and API protection, RASP, rate limiting, bot protection and DDoS purpose built to eliminate the challenges of legacy WAF.

Sample Customers

MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City Bank

Chef, Adobe, Datadog, Etsy, GrubHub, Vimeo, SendGrid, Under Armour, Duo, AppNexus

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)

March 2024

Free Report: F5 Advanced WAF vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced WAF vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 Advanced WAF vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.