We performed a comparison between Fiorano ESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."
"The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code."
"The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications."
"Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places."
"Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."
"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality."
"There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"This solution should work better with RESTful services."
Fiorano ESB is ranked 10th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 5 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 6th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. Fiorano ESB is rated 9.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fiorano ESB writes "Scalable and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". Fiorano ESB is most compared with Mule ESB and IBM Integration Bus, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse. See our Fiorano ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.