New Relic and Honeycomb.io offer valuable features for application monitoring and troubleshooting, with New Relic providing customizable dashboards and reliable customer service, while Honeycomb.io stands out for its advanced visualization capabilities and collaborative features. New Relic is noted for its reasonable pricing and flexible licensing options, while Honeycomb.io has received praise for its competitive pricing and positive ROI. Some areas for improvement for New Relic include report generation speed and dashboard customization options, while Honeycomb.io users have called for more integrations with other tools and improved documentation and support resources.
Features: New Relic stands out for its detailed application monitoring and customizable dashboards, while Honeycomb.io excels in advanced visualization, high cardinality query support, flexible querying, and collaborative features. Both offer valuable insights but cater to different needs.
Pricing and ROI: New Relic has a minimal and straightforward setup cost, with flexible licensing options. Honeycomb.io offers competitive pricing and fair value, with a straightforward setup cost and licensing structure for easy budgeting. New Relic users saw improved efficiency, better app monitoring, and saved resources. Honeycomb.io users praised its performance insights, troubleshooting capabilities, user-friendly interface, and productivity gains.
Room for Improvement: New Relic has room for improvement in increasing report generation speed, customizing dashboards, simplifying the user interface, and enhancing integration. Honeycomb.io needs improvements in integrations, UI complexity, affordability, and documentation/support resources.
Deployment and customer support: Users have reported varying durations for establishing New Relic, ranging from several months to just a week. In contrast, feedback on Honeycomb.io indicates faster implementation, with deployment taking up to three weeks and setup requiring only a few days. Context plays a crucial role in understanding the differences in deployment and setup timelines between the two products. New Relic excels in customer service with top-notch ratings for helpfulness, responsiveness, and expertise. Users feel valued and supported. Honeycomb.io also receives praise for their helpful and responsive support, with clear communication and expert assistance noted.
The summary above is based on 31 interviews we conducted recently with New Relic and Honeycomb.io users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."
"The alert mechanism is quite accurate when something goes wrong in your system. For example, if you have hundreds of APIs on your server, and any of the APIs is not performing well, you get an alert. When there is a drop or change in the threshold value, the beauty of New Relic is that within a fraction of seconds, all the stakeholders who are configured in the New Relic system will get an alert. That's one good thing."
"It offers helpful user metrics so we can learn more about the user experience."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Support for plug-ins (RMQ, Redis etc.) is a valuable feature."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It is easy to track and easy to follow."
"The most valuable features are infrastructure monitoring and application performance monitoring (APM)."
"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."
"The service maps that it creates, the health maps that it creates, the insights that it provides, etc., are all quite useful."
"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."
"There are times when you restart the engines and the servers have a unique ID for the host and you need to remove the server. It is difficult because some are on-premise and others are production hosts. Having downtime is not very good when updating. However, it is not a constant issue."
"It is a serious tool and requires a lot of time invested in order to understand how it works."
"They could improve the education process and how people understand that these tools are very technical. Right now, if someone was to pick it up from day one, it is a very steep learning curve."
"There were some settings we had issues with."
"We would like to receive more AWS-specific details from the New Relic Dashboard, like EC2 health."
"The deployment process could be improved."
"The connectivity between legacy and newer cloud applications is not great."
"The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure."
Honeycomb.io is ranked 37th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. Honeycomb.io is rated 8.0, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Honeycomb.io writes "A valuable solution for application teams to identify downtime and SLO-related issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Honeycomb.io is most compared with Grafana, Sentry, Chronosphere, Datadog and Azure Monitor, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability and Grafana.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
