We performed a comparison between HPE System Management and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."
"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."
"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."
"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."
"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."
"This is a good product and I recommend it."
"The solution allows you to configure and customize how you want to collect information from servers or other systems."
"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"The calculations part is the most valuable."
"We like the user-interface for this solution, which makes it an easy to use tool."
"It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"The basic setup is very easy."
"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."
"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."
"I think that support integration could be improved."
"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."
"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."
"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"We had some scalability issues with a large number of nodes."
"There's a small module of APM, however, it is not an enhanced version. People usually ask for a full-fledged APM solution."
"The product delivers false positives during reporting because of flapping. Other reasonably priced alternatives may have better performance."
"The System Center Operations Manager can be improved."
"The product could be more secure and more stable."
"Zabbix could improve when it comes to large-scale use cases. Additionally, the inventory could be better when connecting to other solutions, such as ServiceNow. There show to be better integration with other platforms and storage."
"Zabbix is powerful, but it is difficult to understand initially. There are many things that can be improved, but we might not be using Zabbix to its fullest extent. The software has more features than we need."
"I would like to remotely connect to the computer, and Zabbix doesn't have this capability."
HPE System Management is ranked 19th in Server Monitoring with 8 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Server Monitoring with 101 reviews. HPE System Management is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE System Management writes " Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". HPE System Management is most compared with Lenovo XClarity Controller and Microsoft Configuration Manager, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI. See our HPE System Management vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
