We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"The performance is good."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Ruckus Wireless WAN is the antenna technology."
"The initial setup of Ruckus Wireless WAN is very easy."
"The solution is easy to use and offers good management for wireless."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"The performance of this solution is amazing in terms of radiofrequency technology."
"Tech support is good."
"The solution can scale well."
"The feature I like most, is the product activity."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"This product needs a point-to-point, bridge solution."
"In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz."
"The connectivity and mobility for users could be improved."
"There could be more power supply for the radio features."
"They could include a firewall feature in the next release but even there it's not really necessary"
"There is a significant issue with wireless functionality in Apple devices, particularly during video calls."
"Pricing could be improved in Ruckus Wireless WAN because obviously, everybody wants things to become cheaper. Another room for improvement in the product is from a delivery perspective, particularly the heavy delivery delays because of the chip shortage that a lot of manufacturers have to deal with. The chip shortage is not coming to an end, but Ruckus Networks has to make a plan because the ETA has slipped out from the average of three months on switches to fourteen months, which is very, very rough on the industry at the moment. Ruckus Wireless WAN could lose business to Chinese competitors, for example, HTC has a good wireless solution that I haven't tested yet, other than on POC, and it works great. I haven't yet experienced the HTC wireless solution in large deployments, so you never know how it's going to go, but HTC has managed to circumvent the chip shortage, so the ETA provided by HTC is much more preferred than the ETAs provided by Ruckus Networks, Cisco, and Aruba products."
"The documentation they do have is very difficult to understand. There should be some scenarios, deployments, complications, or techniques to follow. They are inadequate in that regard, and the documentation needs to be greatly improved."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.